User talk:Busy Stubber

Hello, Busy Stubber! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe 12:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

betacommand messages

Not that I'd know how to do. There are some really nifty scripts that some users have written, I'm sure there are users who would be happy to take on the task. How to enlist their help is the problem though.

Perhaps a message at the village pump in the Technical or Assistance section.

I hope I've been of some help. Regards LittleOldMe 14:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet

Hi! I was quite disappointed with you accusing me of claiming to be the same person who disagreed on your removal of the links on Earned Value Management. To be honest, I felt really bad about it as these accusations are simply not true. I've seen the edit that you made (removing the external links) shortly after and I didn't quite approve of this edit. To be honest, I waited, out of respect to you, till more at least 2 other people agree that it wasn't a very accurate edit (for lack of better words). Anyways, I don't want to feel offended by my edit. To be honest, this is the first time I know what a sock puppet is, and I was amazed that you already know about this. Anyways, I think you know my point, and if you don't agree that this is a legitimate edit please express your opinion on the talk page of the article itself, no need to accuse someone of adding his own link (like you did on the talk page of the article to the other person) or accusing me of being a sock puppet. I'm just here because I'm interested in Project Management and not to start wars. I appreciate what you're doing and I know that you've done it in good faith, but put yourself in my shoes, wouldn't think that it's a bit offending to accuse someone of something that you most probably think it's not true (or, at the very least, you 're just assuming it's true). Pm master 04:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Coin Image

First if all, I put that in the image just so that it would look like a face when scaled down. How often do people see it in high resolution, other than if they look at the page of the icon itself? At the size it is normally seen, it is hard to tell its a dog. Look at other icon images, you'll see they do similar things. aido2002^talk 04:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that seems like a much more logical issue to bring up. :) Anyway, while I understand your concern, I have to say I respectfully disagree with you, since the image is such a basic thing, being only used on a stub template, and not even often called attention to. Plus, I think that just because it happens to parody a U.S. coin doesn't mean that we shouldn't use it, because there really is no "generic" coin. I'm going to revert the template back, but if you can find a few others who agree with you, I'll be more than happy to edit the image. aido2002^talk 18:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if I am doing this right... :)

I wasn't sure how to reply back to your message, so I hope this is right. :)

I read the book as a project one of my management classes (getting my master's...ugh!). Should I not have edited those mentioned articles? If not, I can delete them...it's not a big deal to me! :)

Have a great day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdc545 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on your talk page :). --Busy Stubber 19:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, not sure how to do this. I was adding links to inform about internal company organizations. It is no more promotion than the company article itself. It is not spam. I am an employee of the company in question and I merely wanted to offer more information about an important part of our company.--GUIB Corrector 06:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Academic disciplines

I am not aware of any guidelines focusing on articles about academic disciplines. WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#INFO might be relevant as general guidelines, though subject to interpretation.--Palaeovia^talk 01:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The disciplines in List of academic disciplines seem to be mixed as far as having lists of schools or departments in the articles. Mathematical physics has no list of schools, Native American studies does. Silviculture and Interlinguistics don't, Industrial relations does. It would be helpful to have something covering this in Category:Wikipedia content guidelines, I think. Just an idea. Once a general list of schools or departments gets started in one of these articles, it's not clear where WP:NOT#DIR kicks in. --Busy Stubber 14:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atmosphere International (trade Show)

The anons are back to remove the tags I placed on this article. I've tagged it for speedy deletion, but I'm not going to keep following this page much longer. I've got more fun things to do in wikiland. Regards—G716 <^T·_C> 03:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help -- I was losing the ability to assume good faith there! --Busy Stubber 23:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Interac (Japan)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Interac (Japan), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interac (Japan). Thank you. J 03:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just read your input on Interac on the Talk page. Very interesting stuff. I think it really does belong on the article page. Can you sum that up and put it in the article?DDD DDD (talk) 04:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]