Talk:Touch of Evil

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

One of the links at the bottom of the page goes to epinions.com, and isn't really an "article" per se. Is this okay? Karatloz 12:33, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This article is badly in need of a cleanup. It reads more as a review of the film or an essay on its subject matter than a POV report. For instance: "Marlene Dietrich as Tanya, a cigar-smoking Mexican gypsy brothel owner with huge beautiful eyes..." "Touch of Evil is rich and ripe with menace and atmosphere..." "Universal International acquiesced with bad grace..." and so on. PBP 04:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the plot section, will work on a director's trademark, etc section later.Xijjix 18:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The synopsis isn't a synopsis --129.100.191.57 21:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Film firsts'

I removed the following, which is simply untrue; there's at least one earlier example, in Gun Crazy (1949). The Singing Badger 22:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was the first film where a driving scene was actually filmed from the driven vehicle. In this scene a convertible is driven at (apparently) very high speed through narrow back alleys, with many cross streets, and not for any particular reason except for the thrill of the danger. The camera was mounted on the hood of the car. Charlton Heston was not only the driver, but the camera operator and sound man.

Added information

I added information of the Touch of Evil restoration premiere at Cannes being cancelled because of litigation from Welles' daughter Beatrice. I was incredibly surprised that the information was not in the article, as it seems to be an important fact to me. If the one reference isn't enough, I can provide more. Green451 03:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note that I have nothing personal against Beatrice Welles, it just seemed to me that this was a piece of information that should be in the article. Green451 01:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Touchofevil.jpg

Image:Touchofevil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Director's Cut

Welles stated in the 58 page memo that the film was no longer his version - it was the studio's cut, but as such he was willing to help them with it. Someone replace "director's cut" with "posthumous director's cleanup edit of studio version" if you want the truth of the matter.71.205.219.229 (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Widescreen Matting Controversy

There's been plenty of online articles about the "venetian blind" matting of the picture, which basically cropped the full-frame image released on VHS, but I don't see any mention of the controversy or criticism here.71.205.219.229 (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]