User talk:Delldot

Archives

1: 10/05–12/06
2: 12/06–01/07
3: 01/07–02/07
4: 02/07–03/07
5: 03/07–06/07
6: 06/07–09/07
7: 09/07–11/07
8: 11/07–11/07
9: 11/07–12/07
10: 12/07–01/08
11: 01/08–02/08
12: 02/08–03/08
13: 03/08–04/08
14: 04/08–05/08
15: 05/08–06/08
16: 06/08–07/08
17: 07/08–07/08
18: 07/08–08/08
19: 08/08–10/08
20: 10/08–04/09
21: 04/09–01/10
22: 01/10–11/12
23: 12/12–03/13
24: 05/13–12/15

Thanks for dropping me a note! Don't be shy about asking questions, I'm always glad to help. I will reply to messages here, so you may want to watchlist this page.

If you'd like to undo an action of mine and can't get a hold of me within a reasonable time, go ahead. If I disagree, we can discuss it when I'm back. This applies to admin actions too.

November 2007

DemonicRhino replaced my user talk page with this message:

From Demonic Rhino, i will just create more accounts and i have different computers and different friends, that will always delete your things. May the force be with you...NOT!

Looks like someone is asking for some blacklisting.

I'm tired of this, and they should be as well. I think I'll just let other Wikipedians deal with them. Too much time has been wasted from their shenanigans.

May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 17:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yo

why you deleting timmyland?

My reply delldot talk 17:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage :)--Kubigula (talk) 04:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any time! :D delldot talk 06:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit

hey no problem, glad I could contribute. See you around here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triplesix666mafia (talk • contribs) 06:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look forward to it! delldot talk 06:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

New user Usla nz created his/her talk page and it was filled with info about the company of USLA, New Zealand. First, I placed {{uw-username}} on his/her page, but later, I noticed a site address. I then placed {{uw-spam}} there, and removed the previous tl, for both of them started from "Welcome", it would look odd. Also, I deleted the promotion. However, his/her name is still inappropriate, I think. Also, I proposed him/her to create an article about the company instead of placing data on his/her page, was this right?

A. Demidov (talk) 09:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 07:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SHARED

This is a shared IP, and please do not publish this IP on the web. Also the article of was not authorized by the artists. The artist request to be removed any of his information on the discussion page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.11.179 (talk • contribs)

Failed to reply. delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jjj222

Hi Delldot - I appreciate very much the spirit of your message. I've been a part of Wikipedia in one way or another since the very beginning, and am very familiar with the wiki way. This particular user, Jjj22, (have a look here if you don't believe me) is a serial vandal, user of multiple sockpuppets, and is in general an abusive user who should be permanently banned. Furthermore, I think it's extremely premature and therefore useless to speculate on Mike Piazza's Hall of Fame induction. I would say his induction is hardly a forgone conclusion, as better players than himself have been denied. Considering the uselessness of this content, and Jjj22s hundreds of very POV edits with the intent of skewing every article possible to the favor of the New York Mets, is why I reverted the edit and used foul language. Jjj22 is simply an offense to articles I've worked on when there were hardly any baseball editors on Wikipedia. In conclusion I agree with the spirit of your note, but disagree totally with the content. Until admins. finally do the right thing and ban this abusive user, I'm going to do whatever it takes to let him know that his POV edits will get him nothing but grief. Googie man 20:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you look at the edit summary here, you'll see that Jjj22 already undid the good faith edit of a good user who undid the edit because it was POV and had no sources. Googie man 20:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING!

The entire article in unsourced. You are delving into subject matter of which you know NOTHING, and it REALLY PISSES ME OFF!! I met Buzz Shaw, I know Buzz Shaw and it is YOU who are letting YOUR UNSOURCED OPINIONS GET IN THE WAY!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.183.246 (talk • contribs)

My reply delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wavester (Wikipedia:About vandal)

I have read over this latest act of vandalism that you reverted, and there was a death threat in it. He probably didn't mean to follow through with the act, but it concerned me nonetheless. I wanted to bring this to your attention. Savie Kumara 07:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 08:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I usually see if the user vandalizes one more time before I report the user, but this may be a different situation? Your call. Savie Kumara 08:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nothing lately, maybe they went away. I'll check again later. delldot talk 09:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa...

Just read over that weird Death Threat thing...and I thought I had issues!! That is just down right disturbing considering some IP addresses can be traced pretty darn well these days...76.105.183.246 08:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, par for the course delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Beckham

I've updated the CSD tags that I put since I preferred to have as second opinion. Best regards--Tikiwont 09:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, duh, sorry bout that delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Would it be possible to know for sure if some certain user has more than one account? Just a query. And isn't it a strange thing to have more than one account? Seriously, if you have one account already I don't see why anyone would want to have yet another. May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator 00:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 01:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP

DO NOT PUBLISH MY IP ADDRESS.

Thanks for the cleanup

... of my sadly neglected userpage. Still, at least we have some discussion of what this guy's beef is now; I'll see if we can come to some compromise. Ecobun 11:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! Good for you for working it out constructively. :) delldot talk 02:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I remember you asked me how the WAIS article is going. I'm very busy with school stuff these days. I've been learning the hard way that it's always best to take care of all responsibilities before you do anything else. I think I'll finally be able to catch up with myself in many ways during the Winter break. Eventually I'll even get around to serving my true purpose as a Wikipedian. I've taken a look at the articles concerning animation, and I simply must contribute all kinds of information, such as the many princicples of character animation. Squash and stretch, etc. May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator 00:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! delldot talk 02:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electrons

Hey, I'm running into you on RC Patrol tonight, so I thought I'd give ya a little something. Granted, it's just a few electrons, but hey, people oftentimes don't get thanked for things. So:

Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 05:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the electrons! :D delldot talk 05:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never really done much with the IRC channels. Is there anything worth it on there? Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 05:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 05:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

r u serious?

that was a real post check myspace for the cracker barrel crackas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.97.197.3 (talk) 07:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 07:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

small world

I am a EMT-P, going to DO school next fall my roomate is getting his masters in Neurobiology and aging at USF. What reliable source should I cite. The rap group is real (like spinal tap) based out of lebanon/kingsport tn.

matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.97.197.3 (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 07:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Chen (Serbian rapper)

Hi, Delldot. Why did you warn the creator of this page for blanking it? Looks like he may want us to delete it or something? Dloh cierekim 22:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. You are welcome. Just wanted to make sure I did not miss something. Dloh cierekim 01:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:) delldot talk 02:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of SomerVille Ecovillage

Hi delldot,

It was a bit of a shock to find SomerVille Ecovillage deleted.

I spent quite a long time researching and adding references after the notability had been questioned.

There is no copyright violation as I am the author of the official SomerVille Ecovillage web site. Moondyne does not have his or her facts straight. Yes, there are several vacant paddocks within the 399 acres but there are families living on the land now with more on the way. I would be happy to arrange a tour for Moondyne as visitors are welcome by appointment.

It is not clear to me on what basis the article was eventually deleted. Are you able to clarify this for me?

I don't expect everyone to like the article and as a relatively new author on Wikipedia, would appreciate tips on how I can improve it rather than just having the article deleted for no valid reason.

Thanks,

Neil

Ozneil (talk) 08:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 10:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further Discussion Ozneil (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 04:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What?

I'm the only person using this IP address and I didn't even go on the Taxi article, let alone vandalize it. Why did I get messaged about vandalizing it and what was it that I supposedly put on there?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.139.113 (talk • contribs)

Beats me. delldot talk 09:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hello I am trying to set up my page , but you keep deleting it before I have finsihed it! I am a part of the TANGENT and have copied their page to use as a template for my own. If mine is being deleted can you please explain to me why the Tangent page has not been...? Or what I am missing from my embryonic effrt to ensure it stays around a while so I can finish it off! Ta Guy Manning —Preceding unsigned comment added by GuyManning (talk • contribs) 11:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 11:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Manning

I see why it was tagged and deleted, but the article does in fact assert some notability, in that it states the subject ~~was~~ is a member of The Tangent and credits three albums, all of which have articles, by the band with him as a member, . That seems just about to meet WP:BAND. Just prior to the article's deletion I placed advice regarding WP:AB and WP:BAND on the author's talkpage. I'm not advocating undeletion, but if the article comes back it might be worth keeping an eye on it to see if it develops. Cheers, Tonywalton ^Talk 11:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 11:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've given him substantially the same advice as you on his talkpage (we edit conflicted). Nice to see people singing from the same songsheet ☺ Tonywalton ^Talk 11:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i am sladeakakevin

disabled from editing by the infidel mayalld

my page was my own personal page me and my friends sent messages to each other and he has disabled me from editing my friends pages from now on i will be an annonamous editor not in an account forgive me i have began a spree of vandalisim because of the fool. i appolagize to those who respect others personal space edit my old page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.9.226 (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lolololol

Re: Your message [1] LOL! You got him! Savie Kumara (talk) 01:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:D delldot talk 04:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Garvey

That's one cleanup job. Removing the pop references and the quotes were fine, as was cutting out cites about MLK. You may have cut a bit too deep. Can you please place a note on the talk page to justify cutting out all the pop culture and other cites? Bearian (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see you did it already. Good job. Never mind. :-) Bearian (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, feel free to weigh in delldot talk 22:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added an artikel for wiki but till so far it has not been approved

Hello Delldot,

I want to edit the artikel I have added to wikipedia but till so far it has not been approved. Do I need to open an new artikel or do I have to wait for any comment?

There is more stuff to add & edit so I hope to get some clues.

Greetings from Holland.Lammert (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 13:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Streamyx

That was really odd... When I opened the tab the prod was still on the article - it was placed on 2007-12-03-014256 and you removed it at 2:25 and the version that I was working on at 2:28 still had it on! I'll restore it if you want to go thru the AfD for it - just let me know. SkierRMH (talk) 02:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Totally up to you delldot talk 03:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree- given the history obviously no one cared! Common sense would tell me if someone does care they can re-create it! SkierRMH (talk) 03:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed :) delldot talk 03:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi delldot

"Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mental disorder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot talk 14:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)"

i was expressing my appreciation for all who are wanting to read about mental disorders. they want to view that and it's not long at all. get it. it would be wrong to delete my information. My website for excellence. www.myspace.com/apromoterofgod7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.73.243.102 (talk • contribs)

the diff I reverted My reply delldot talk 01:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I'd barely found I had "new messages" only to find it had already been reverted. Much appreciated! --HamatoKameko (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:D delldot talk 15:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Racism

I was trying to remove racist statements from the article about the caucasion race, and I was accused of vandalism. I don't know of any other way to remove the racist statements. I don't agree that I vandalized that page...I was trying to improve the content of wikipedia. Please read that article and see if you agree with me that it is racist. I don't know what else I can do if trying to remove the information won't work.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Let me look into it delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I understand you must be very busy.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely! delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

template info making

Hi Got your note about the template and asking if you can kill the redirect. Yes, could you please delete this page (it's just a redirect to where I think the infobox usage should be) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:N-Number&redirect=no

thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecuguru (talk • contribs) 08:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reply delldot talk 08:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. I originally found a random example and tried to match it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Infobox_Automobile%22. However compliant you can make it is cool, I'm just looking for somewhere to keep a usage description separate from the template. thanks! (Ecuguru (talk) 12:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ok, done, thanks! delldot talk 22:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im warning u

He wouldn't answer my comment and it was deleted and check the history the original comment was not a personal attack i was stating something true