ABOUT THE RELEASE DATE

January 11th is the German release date which is a non-notable release date. It doesn't need to be in the article and no date should be added for the US or UK until one is confirmed for the physical release. Just because it's coming out in Germany on January 11th doesn't mean it will come out in the US that week - "Gimme More" was released in the US over a month before it was released in Germany. --Starsareblind07 (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not just US and UK release dates are important. I think we should keep the German release date. — Jhn* 18:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But it should be mentioned then that it's only German release and not worldwide Zone (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC

January 7th is the UK release date.--Jak3m 18:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Image:Piece of me britney.jpg or Image:Pieceofme.jpg?

UK release date 01/07/2008 http://www.sonybmgmusic.co.uk/news/7704/0/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkhlystun (talk • contribs) 09:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=

Australian release date Jan 21 2008 http://www.bigwentertainment.com.au/product.asp?intProductID=1649804&intArtistID=8571 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.43.15 (talk) 11:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Piece of me britney.jpg

Image:Piece of me britney.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pieceofme.jpg

Image:Pieceofme.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

I think the info. regarding the specific details of what will happen in the music video should be taken out. As far as I know, all the stories that have been released about the music video have been purely based on either speculation or are unconfirmed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.2.66.36 (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sources says that the video was not actually taken because Spears was late and that the preparations are for the other recording artist, not hers. BritandBeyonce (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i've seen a thirty second clip on youtube and fansites, it states it will premiere tomorrow on some show about britney. 89.100.191.27 (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC) E-To-The-Izzo[reply]

Chart Positions

BILLBOARD:

Who keeps putting the Billboard peak position at 63 instead of 65? it is 65. don't change it. wait for a while and it will achieve higher positions. as of now - 65.

No, it debuted at number 65, then fell to number 80, but then climbed to number 63. check the link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.133.149 (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UNITED WORLD CHART:

How can anybody know that the song achieved the number 41 position on Media Traffic? They release data only for the top 40 songs and albums. I delete it for now, unless someone explains or puts a link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.133.149 (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, the chart positions section is so ridiculous. I mean, 'massive airplay' in Nauru? Who knows the population of this country and how many radio stations they have? With the existing numbers it's inappropriate to call it 'massive'. Also, the section on Tourism in Philippines, how can anyone make a claim like that? This section should be improved. P.S. Stop adding stuff like 'the single currently sits at number XX at iTunes' - it's silly. Lets make an article of a good standard, rather than stuffing it with all the minor and irrelevant information. Zone (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this!

It is apparent that Spears's face is edited onto the body of the dancer near the end of the video.

This is a rumor! it isnt confirmed and...it isnt even being reported by anyone(TMZ, Perez Hilton, X17....)! This is just made up by someone who obviously isnt a fan of her! I have deleted it! Please let it stay this way! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikkomuitnederland (talk • contribs) 22:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the song.....

Who is the guy that in every other sentence asks "You Want a Piece of Me"? Yellowstone County Girl (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overkill

Dont you think the music video section a too long and confusing? I do--Jak3m (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two versionz of da same vid???

Are there two different versionz, one American and one International? The video is damn hot btb.

RELEASE DATE 2007- 2008!

I just read that the release date will be JANUARY 15th, 2008 IN THE ENTIRE EU, January 16th AUSTRALIA, CHINA, JAPAN, NEW ZEALAND and February 1st, 2008 IN MEXICO!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Welovekes (talk • contribs) 20:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why...

isn't there a U.S. release date for the single? Hasn't it already premiered in the U.S.?? It's being played on radio...the music video is now out....i think it's been released. Or, if I'm wrong, then why isn't there an American release date?? Britney IS from America after all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.2.70.143 (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian peak

The song is currently #7 on the Canadian Hot 100, not #11.

http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?f=Canadian+Hot+100&pageNumber=Top+1-10&g=Singles —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailorearth (talk • contribs) 07:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have to add sales on this single!!

we have to add sales on this single?? on united world chart it has sold 71000 copies —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlwaysHere123 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]