User talk:RiainMcA

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Waffle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 16:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Stephenb. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 16:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:RiainMcA, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 16:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 hour in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 17:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gwernol 17:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RiainMcA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because i was editing my own user talk page, i mean if anythin that should be seen as a page i have primary control over, if i was editing more public pages then i can see why you'd be pissed but quite frankly, get the buckkk! cant you have a laugh at WikiHQ? if this aint reason enough then i'll write another reason, Thanks

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Because i was editing my own user talk page, i mean if anythin that should be seen as a page i have primary control over, if i was editing more public pages then i can see why you'd be pissed but quite frankly, get the buckkk! cant you have a laugh at WikiHQ? if this aint reason enough then i'll write another reason, '''Thanks''' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because i was editing my own user talk page, i mean if anythin that should be seen as a page i have primary control over, if i was editing more public pages then i can see why you'd be pissed but quite frankly, get the buckkk! cant you have a laugh at WikiHQ? if this aint reason enough then i'll write another reason, '''Thanks''' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because i was editing my own user talk page, i mean if anythin that should be seen as a page i have primary control over, if i was editing more public pages then i can see why you'd be pissed but quite frankly, get the buckkk! cant you have a laugh at WikiHQ? if this aint reason enough then i'll write another reason, '''Thanks''' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note for reviewing admin. This user was blocked for [this disruptive edit], not for edits to their own talk page. Gwernol 17:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE FOR REVIEWING ADMIN: did that edit disrupt your day? if it did i apologize, but... i dont care! i thought the reason on that profile to protest the block was perfectly viable so i thought if i was givin the choice to unblock "hp no. whatever" then i should. and if it was those edits i was blocked for why did i recieve warnings for previously editing messages on my own talk page? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. oieee :]