User talk:Peytonio

Comments

HEy! Peyton Cline?

Suggestions

Complaints

Hey Peytonio, you deleted something about the "macula" in the "otolith" article, supposedly because the macula is only contained in the eye, not in the ear. Well, you're wrong! There is such a thing as the "saccular macula" and the "utricular macula", which are the sensory epithelia of the sacculus and utriculus, respectively. You shouldn't be editing an article unless you're more familiar with the topic!

Hey Payton Cline! It's Barrett Deming. Uh, why did you delete the "notable teachers" section that my friends and I worked so hard on? I'm happy to see you added some notable alumni, although they are only noted for football and not academics. However I'm very unhappy with the deletion of a fine section. Although it is debatable that the teachers in question were not notable, with time that would improve to the point where only the most notable of teachers/staff are listed. Keep in mind that students are only the "customers" of schools, the staff runs the business. Teachers are an important add.

I reverted the page because it is a direct violation to Wikipedia's standards.
- How? Crazykid777 22:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - It was the wording... and the information about Topich being really liberal and Cardona being a ninja were pointless for this site. They can certainly be on there, but you must include other teachers as well and must have their consent. --RPC (Peytonio) 23:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - I didn't put any of that, I just briefly stated that they were notable for what they brought to the school. I assume that was Ryan Graham, IDK, check history...Still, we need to add these teachers, and other students of notability in academic areas...Crazykid777 03:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - So Ryan supposedly did that... hmm... I'm not opposed to the addition of the teachers, but we don't need to put the no-cheating policy for Cardona... that is a given at any school... his is just the thing about cutting people up, and that's just for fun anyways. --RPC (Peytonio) 21:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

Please note that we already have an article on The Beatles' album 1 (1 (album)). In fact we have hundreds of articles on The Beatles, so if something is missing from the main article it usually means it's written elsewhere! Thanks. --kingboyk 01:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the info. --RPC (Peytonio) 19:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:(ONe).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:(ONe).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Crtenor01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crtenor01.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 02:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the truth, it's about "Who cares?"

Hi, I need no proof of your or Sam Hazo's attendance at the Arkansas All-State conference because I'm an Arkansas music major and am fully aware that he was there. It doesn't belong in the article because it violates WP:NOTE — it's completely non-notable. If we listed every conference Sam Hazo has been a clinician at (along with irrelevant tangential details about those conferences like how many bands were there) his entry would be three megabytes long. And if being a clinician somewhere warrants a mention on Wikipedia, God bless the maintainers of Fred Fennell's page, or Alfred Reed's, or any other big band person.

If something majorly significant to the outside world happened at All-State, then by all means include it. But make sure it passes the test at WP:NOTE first. SFT | Talk 03:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. — Sorry about your user page, I wasn't paying attention.

P.P.S. — New comments on User talk pages should go at the bottom, not the top; you can use the little + button at the top to do this automatically. SFT | Talk 03:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]