Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the CBC

Criticism of the CBC

Delete No sources, POV (by definition), looks like a personal essay. Editing history of the article's principal author suggests the article may originate with one of the CBC's rivals. Reggie Perrin (talk) 05:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources, for that matter, there are no sources at all in the article. Yahel Guhan 05:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. GreenJoe (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CJCurrie (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Mh29255 (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. GreenGourd (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay in violation of WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:V. Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anything that is sourced and verified with the main article. Otherwise, it's just a POV fork. 23skidoo (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge then Delete. Give the editors a bit of time to merge this with CBS, then delete it as a POV fork. Malinaccier (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean CBC not CBS, right? meshach (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, a lot of this article was cut and pasted directly out of the primary article — I remember almost every word of it and even contributed some of it myself in the first place (such as the controversy around 22 Minutes and Air Farce airing on Newsworld.) Merge the valid, sourced stuff back into the main article from whence it came; delete any content that's too POV. Bearcat (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Bless sins (talk) 23:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]