User talk:Crips r us

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cartoon_Network

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nickelodeon

{{unblock|I told him that the name was innapropriate and that I wanted to change it, yet he still blocked me.}}

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Sorry for jumping the gun. Make sure to head over to Wikipedia:Changing username within 24 hours, okay? Request handled by: GlassCobra 01:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Billy and Mandy character list

Yes, I did. There is already too much detail with no real world significance at that article, we don't need another one. J Milburn (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main list of characters article needs serious help- you may want to work on that. However, splitting it is not the answer. J Milburn (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy skyline

Hi, you've added to the Textron Headquarters article that it is a part of the Family Guy skyline. This is not the case. Take a look at the comparison pics in Quahog (Family Guy). Only One Financial Center, 50 Kennedy Plaza, and the Bank of America Tower are shown.--Loodog (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for failing to change username after 24 hours and sockpuppetry concerns. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GlassCobra 06:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crips r us (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to change my username as seen in the change username section, but they said some stuff that I didn't get, so I assumed that my user name was changed. Also I didn't do anything wrong as seen in my contributions page.

Decline reason:

The problem was, you asked for a username (Numbuh 7) that was already taken, so they couldn't rename you to that. You left a message at User talk:Numbuh 7 asking for that user to change names but it probably won't happen because that user edited Wikipedia only once, almost two years ago. Here's what we should do. Since you've had some confusion checking whether a username exists, post your top 5 choices for a new username with a new unblock request, and someone will let you know which one is the top one available. (I note, for instance, that User:NumbuhSeven is not taken.) Mango juice^talk 16:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want NumbuhSeven as my new name.Crips r us (talk) 16:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Crips r us (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a new name ready to be requested, also I didn't do anything wrong on Wikipedia, but just in case, I want user Eliach to explain what he means by "origional run" of Ed, Edd n Eddy.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I have a new name ready to be requested, also I didn't do anything wrong on Wikipedia, but just in case, I want user Eliach to explain what he means by "origional run" of Ed, Edd n Eddy. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have a new name ready to be requested, also I didn't do anything wrong on Wikipedia, but just in case, I want user Eliach to explain what he means by "origional run" of Ed, Edd n Eddy. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have a new name ready to be requested, also I didn't do anything wrong on Wikipedia, but just in case, I want user Eliach to explain what he means by "origional run" of Ed, Edd n Eddy. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please hold on a bit. There is an open checkuser request on you, because your editing pattern may fit that of a blocked user. If that comes back clean, I'd be happy to unblock. As for the Ed, Edd n Eddy edits, yes, discussing the dispute with other users is a good idea, definitely better than warring over the current version of the article. Mango juice^talk 16:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sooooo much! It feels so good to have someone talk to me as nice as you!Crips r us (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To MangoJuice

Listen. I really have a problem with Elaich. See, he is talking behind my back, and he has sniched on me saying, "His 24 hours are up, and he hasn't changed his user name yet. -- Elaich talk 05:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)". That was none of his buisness and it was between me and GlassCobra. Please I don't hate him, but could you set him in the wright direction for me, and the sake of Wikipedia?Crips r us (talk) 17:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]