Jump to content

User talk:LAX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bubbamickmac (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 7 February 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hey, what is your problem, why do you have to be so harsh on me? I was only trying to edit it and it came out wrong, ok?

LAX 
 "I reject your edits and substitute my own." | Talk Page ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) | Contributions ( edit count )
Click here to start a new discussion
Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==.

Archives
Archive 1   Archive 2   Archive 3
Archive 4   Archive 5   Archive 6

FYI

Cross-posted to other Kliq members

Please see the note on my userpage. Any comments for helping with content development for the forthcoming week (until Saturday at least) will be rejected on request. I am basically taking a "Mini-Break". Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Projects

Hey, LAX, just wanted to thank you for inviting me to join your editing group and you'd be happy to know that I've added myself to two projects. Also, this came to mind, the 2005 Taboo Tuesday article has been created by a User:Cimmo and I just wanted to let you know first hand that the user most likely took the article, but if not then I'll be more than happy to expand the article. Zenlax T C S 19:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're welcome on the notice. Then, can the article be expanded between the group? Also, just wanted to let you know that I'm all better and I'm starting to work on the event section for WrestleMania 21. Also, I like your userpage design, that I'd like for it to be on my userpage, but I'm having problems with it; if its alright, do you think you can help me with correcting the problem? Zenlax T C S 20:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely, if anymore are needed then I think they should be included. The colors I would like to use would be in the Green range; one in particular would be the color Forest Green. And thank you for taking your time to help me out. Zenlax T C S 20:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course; the black color I would like to substitute with Forest Green, the purple color I would like to replace it with Yellow Green and for the Userboxes / Barnstars I would like for the background to be replaced with Olive Drab. That's basically all the colors that I see that would need to be replaced with. Zenlax T C S 20:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for one the color doesn't show or my iPhone has problems the with color settings. But, if you look at the Olive drab article, the color is shown there. Zenlax T C S 20:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. Zenlax T C S 20:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if its no bother. Zenlax T C S 21:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Again, if its no bother. Zenlax T C S 21:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Do you think that the code number #800080 might be a great replacement for Forest Green? Zenlax T C S 21:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I don't want to get into a three revert rule, but is User:Dlae's edits to Randy Orton's article, good edits? And no problem with the questions, since you do indeed need to ask them. Zenlax T C S 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That'd be fine. Zenlax T C S 21:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to see it your way. What colors did you have in mind? Zenlax T C S 19:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'll go with your direction. Or better yet, why not surprise me. Zenlax T C S 19:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, take your time; I don't expect you to finish it all in one day. I understand you are currently working on other projects and I wouldn't want to take you off your tasks. Before I forget, I added a show and hide feature to the Other on-screen talent table and I hope it will not be a problem. Zenlax T C S 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. You are busy. This might sound like a stupid question but, I'll ask it anyway; I was actually thinking of expanding Backlash (2004), after I'm done with WrestleMania XX and 21, and my question to you is do I have to ask someone to help me expand it or can I work on it? Zenlax T C S 20:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd be happy for your company and I know I have a long way to go in finishing the WrestleMania's, which probably gives you time to work on your projects and gives us the time to work on it. Though, I wouldn't want to come between something you and Blue discussed in expanding. Zenlax T C S 20:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then, count me in. One more thing, I've asked Blue to finish the event for WrestleMania 21, is that alright with you? Zenlax T C S 20:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll too, have some free time in my hands. But, first things first. Zenlax T C S 20:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This place looks eerily familiar ...

;-) Congrats on the adminship. -- Oakster  Talk  22:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well since it's my first expansion, I wanted to give a good try at expanding the article. That being said I'm more than welcome for any contributions from other Wikipedians, so go ahead. -- Oakster  Talk  11:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. -- Oakster  Talk  23:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taboo

So, Zenlax told me that Cimmo created the article? Does this guy seriously listen? Anyways, I'll be working on the Rumble article and if you need helping on Taboo Tuesday, just hit me up. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was that the last "You have new messages"? Uh, yeah sure. Why? Did you want to work on the other feuds? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go for it, as long as I have the HBK and Sid feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, cool. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, this is harder than I thought. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for one, I'm trying to see what started the feud between the two, but somehow it goes back to 1995, where Shawn blamed Sid for costing him the WWE title at WrestleMania XI and I can't find any refs. when Shawn became the number one contender to face Sid at the Rumble. I guess, I will need help. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG, I know. I was going to copy and edit some stuff similar to the Rumble '94, but I don't know what started it all. And yeah, if you go to Sid's article, it says after the night after WrestleMania XI, Sid turned on Shawn. Maybe we will have to need some pointers from Gary. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want to ask him together or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sooo tired. I just finished writing the entire event section for Taboo Tuesday. (It took me about an hour, but thats ok.) I'm getting off for tonight, as I'm very tired now. Maybe tomorrow night, I'll work on OTE or Vengeance, not sure yet. iMatthew 2008 02:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prune the four nominations from COTW that need to be pruned? Hornswoggle, Mr.McMahon, Chris Jericho, and Jimmy Snuka. iMatthew 2008 11:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, no problem. iMatthew 2008 11:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's ask him together. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's ask him if he remembers anything from 1997 and pointers on where to get the "refs" for the article. That's what I came up with. Suggestions? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good news. Gary said he will help us out with the feuds for the Rumble, but he's working on some stuff and we can place RR on hold. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your cheating on me? Just kidding. Jeez, you unstoppable PPV maniac. Do you have time for all of those PPV's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, don't go at it alone. Do you need help on SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll look at the reports and see what I can do. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, Kliq member. ;) Remember our motto, "You don't have to go at it alone". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I cut some info., is that okay or do you want me to cut some more? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You did better than me. ;) Congrats. Any other help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Hit me when you need me. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Mania

Ok, I'm basically done WrestleMania XX, but I just need additional citations and ideas for the notes section, and Zenlax can hopefully expand the aftermath a lil' moreTrUCo9311 01:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Austin and ECW match/segments are very good. You really got the hang of it. Now for the Women's battle royal...Battle Royals/elimination matches/royal rumble tend to be long, especially if they have alot of competitors. So in this case, the women's battle royal may have to stay as is since there are many eliminations.--TrUCo9311 01:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, mayby a few rewording, but it should remain that length because of those reasons. Well if you remember when we wrote Survivor Series (2007), I wrote the SS elimination match in that length.--TrUCo9311 01:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Man, we have too many projects...WAY TOO MANY!--TrUCo9311 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Those type of matches should only list the eliminations and that is it. I think one we r done all these projects we should work only on 1 a week to make them a GA/FA.--TrUCo9311 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Totally...--TrUCo9311 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

8th Horseman? Oops, wrong stable.

The Kliq huh? Mind if I join? I've been looking at your works and I must say, NICE JOB! Hope you got room for an 8th member. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is on the Kliq's talk page =] iMatthew 2008 11:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you go close that discussion. bulletproof is in! iMatthew 2008 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 6 4 February 2008 About the Signpost
Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored 
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes" News and notes: Milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Tutorial: Adding citations 
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LAX&oldid=189844818"