User talk:Frogsprog

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Frogsprog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's true B but like I said. Everyone is capable of reform. And plus - that edit was a revert, and plus again that edit was way over a year ago. Why can't I be unblocked and monitored? Time's the greatest healer right? From WP:INDEF "the more usual desired outcome is a commitment to observe Wikipedia's policies and – if unblocked – to refrain from the problematic conduct in future." --Frogsprog (talk) 11:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=That's true [[User:B|B]] but like I said. Everyone is capable of reform. And plus - that edit was a revert, and plus again that edit was way over a year ago. Why can't I be unblocked and monitored? Time's the greatest healer right? From WP:INDEF ''"the more usual desired outcome is a commitment to observe Wikipedia's policies and – if unblocked – to refrain from the problematic conduct in future."''
--[[User:Frogsprog|Frogsprog]] ([[User talk:Frogsprog#top|talk]]) 11:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=That's true [[User:B|B]] but like I said. Everyone is capable of reform. And plus - that edit was a revert, and plus again that edit was way over a year ago. Why can't I be unblocked and monitored? Time's the greatest healer right? From WP:INDEF ''"the more usual desired outcome is a commitment to observe Wikipedia's policies and – if unblocked – to refrain from the problematic conduct in future."''
--[[User:Frogsprog|Frogsprog]] ([[User talk:Frogsprog#top|talk]]) 11:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=That's true [[User:B|B]] but like I said. Everyone is capable of reform. And plus - that edit was a revert, and plus again that edit was way over a year ago. Why can't I be unblocked and monitored? Time's the greatest healer right? From WP:INDEF ''"the more usual desired outcome is a commitment to observe Wikipedia's policies and – if unblocked – to refrain from the problematic conduct in future."''
--[[User:Frogsprog|Frogsprog]] ([[User talk:Frogsprog#top|talk]]) 11:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frogsprog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MONGO has now been de-sysoped so there is no need for his indefblocks to be allowed to remain WP:AGF. Everyone is capable of reform aren't they? I'm willing to be on probation--Frogsprog (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Considering this edit [1], your second most recent, I see no reason to overturn this block. —- B (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.