User talk:Santhemant
Speedy deletion of Ramadasa
A tag has been placed on Ramadasa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <3 bunny 05:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Ramadasa
Ramadasa, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Ramadasa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ramadasa during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Recent addition to Alms undone
sir ia m a new use as i get used to your 'neutral and scholastic tone I will try ..but I am today unable to beg alms from the God in that tone neither did the saint whose words you deleted ..material alms can be asked in that tone but spritual alms for good of ALL ..how can I cahnge the tone and the words of the saint he wrote 400 yrs ago..It is matter of thinking the whole world as a family NOT about being a Indian or a Hindu as is apparent to most who read these lines.Is there no place in wiki for such original words of past ?? santhemant Dear Santhemant -
With a heavy heart and reluctant hand, I undid your recent addition to Alms per Talk:Alms#Recently_added_.22Hinduism.22_section_from_.22all_rights_reserved.22_material_at_http:.2F.2Fsanthemant.sulekha.com.2F. In short, copyrighted material cannot be added to Wikipedia per WP:GFDL. Secondarily, Wikipedia content is ideally written in a neutral, scholastic tone with reliable sources used in citations (per WP:MOS and WP:RS). If you could add such pertinent material regarding Hinduism and alms, it would be greatly appreciated.
I hope you can appreciate that the value of the material you added and its earnest, devotional intent is by no means in question. It is simply a matter of abiding by Wikipedia policy regarding copyrights and style. I hope you see I wish you no harm and wish you great success.