User talk:Woohookitty

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive10. Archives prior to 16 June 2007 were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Novak Djokovic page move

Someone reverted your page move. Can they just do that?--HJensen, talk 14:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please reinstate your page move. It has been a long time since I've seen clearer consensus on a naming issue.Erudy (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

And it still amazes me that a non-admin can just undo the move and casually call the proposal a "waste of time".--HJensen, talk 22:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

So is anything happening with this? I am presuming there is a course of action that can be followed, or can anyone just undo every successful move request that they personally disagree with at any time? Horsesforcorses (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

"Dog-related" to "Dog" templates

Thanks for updating those articles' category as above. I guess I must've been in a verbose mood when setting up the original category! Best wishes, Sardanaphalus (talk) 13:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Isotope tables templates

Hi,

that category was a really good idea, thanks! --Quilbert (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Vickers aircraft

Hi, are you going to create a separate navbox template for the civilian aircraft in this template which you have recently categorised as military? Many thanks. Nimbus227 (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Further to Vickers aircraft - thank you for re-cating all the aviation nav boxes - but please note that most of the new cats do not make any sense - I cant find any discussion of this in the aircraft or aviation projects is their any reason why they cant all be reverted back? Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate that you spent a lot of time on the changes but did you have a concensus for the changes and did you ask anybody at the aircraft project for help or advice? Not sure the division into civilian and military aircraft for example helps when nearly all of the boxes are in both cats. Why have a Experimental aircraft navigational boxes cat? MilborneOne (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Aircraft navbox categories

Hi Woohookitty; I saw what happened the other night with your attempt to categories these navboxes, and I'd like to thank you, both for your effort, and for having the good grace to voluntarily revert what you'd done once some of the fundamental problems had been pointed out.

That having been said, I've noticed the work that you do in categorising navboxes generally, and wonder whether you'd still be interested in categorising these in a fashion that's useful to and compatible with the way that they're actually used in aircraft articles? I fully understand if you're fed up and want to walk away from this area, but if you're still willing to help out, please leave me a note. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 01:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Bleach

FYI, you omitted to remove the template on Category:Bleach (manga). HTH. 70.55.84.253 (talk) 09:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)