User talk:Ultraviolet scissor flame

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Tina_Turner_and_Mary_J_Blige_in_South_Africa.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Britney Spears

Portal:Britney Spears, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Britney Spears during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Madonna (entertainer)

Portal:Madonna (entertainer), a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Madonna (entertainer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Madonna (entertainer) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

MfD nomination of Portal:Mariah Carey

Portal:Mariah Carey, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Mariah Carey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Mariah Carey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Sheryl Crow

Portal:Sheryl Crow, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sheryl Crow and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Sheryl Crow during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LTK-title-screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LTK-title-screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MoonrakerComicStrip.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:MoonrakerComicStrip.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bond

Thanks. After spending quite some money in the Ultimate Collection, I thought all those bonuses could be of some use. But I haven't worked on Licence to Kill yet, so I don't know. I can give it a shot, watch all the extras, search for reviews, etc. And now only seven (official) Bond films need GA status, but we still need to get a second (or third) FA to be approved at the Featured Topics - what work is needed on GoldenEye? igordebraga ≠ 21:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it needed at least some expansion - but that article probably the closer to a second FA in here. It tries to flesh out all aspects of the film (except themes and allusions as you mentioned), while the others are "straight to the point" (this reception sums up everything). I don't know which other has (current) potential to go beyond GA. igordebraga ≠ 01:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul McCartney

"they found a nailed condom and set fire to it". This is not true. Please read the books or stop messing with an article you know very little about.--andreasegde (talk) 06:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[3] Ultra! 08:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you think that's funny or not, but I don't. It took a long time to put over 300 references into the McCartney article, and for you to rewrite history (incorrectly) is a waste of time, as someone will have to revert it. Please stop.--andreasegde (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So how did the fire begin? Ultra! 15:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They had a condom, and as an insult to Koschmider, attached it to/hung it on a nail in the filthy and barely livable rooms, and set fire to it. The walls were bare concrete (no expense spared) and it caused very little damage. Koschmider reported them to the police because he was angry at them for breaking his contract and going to work at the Top Ten Club. I write this because I have read the books, and then someone comes along who hasn't, and edits the truth. How could they have found a nailed condom? Were they in the habit of nailing condoms to the wall for fun? This is the difference, you see...--andreasegde (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop these nonsensical edits to this article, if you add anymore I will teat them as vandalism. Vera, Chuck & Dave (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]