Jump to content

User talk:BanatFree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BanatFree (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 15 March 2008 (→‎Warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 23:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK sir, I will try. --BanatFree 23:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Је ли бре, пизда ли ти материна црногорска

Пизда ли ти материна црногорска, нашао си овде Банаћанина да изиграваш. Само, зајебо си се, нема у Банату таквих хајвана, смрдите бре и преко интернета, одма вас човек осети. Лепо ти мрш у Црну Гору, црногорско ГОВНО једно говњиво, натакнем ти накурац и Његоша и краља Николу и све црногорце од твог прандеде до тебе и твоје деце. Поцркали сви да Бог да, терај се у курац, јебем ти и мртвог оца и мртву мајку. Мрш. 124.138.172.2 00:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More crkni VelikoSrbine, Crnogorci su se oslobodili vase agresije, a ako su oni - bogami cemo i mi! BANAT BANACANIMA!!! --BanatFree (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user's page

Your user page may offend some people. Please see What you must not have on your talk page, as Jimbo Wales said, libelling people on userpages is a bad idea, and in fact, using userpages to attack people or campaign for or against anything or anyone is a bad idea. I see you don't praise Banat but rather aggresively attack Serbs. I will make the offensive sentences on your user page bold, and if you don't delete them before 16 November 2007 I will report that to the administrators. Is that clear? Please let me know if you accept to do that.

Cheers, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He is not offending anyone, he's talking of atrocities that the Serbs have caused against his people and all of them are documented facts. I think you should rather look at those facts instead of being xenophobic and bluntly accusing him of offense. You have in fact exposed the truth in his writings by specifically 'bolding' words and genocide which neither you nor your people seem to want to be reminded of. Your words are rather extremism if I might say. Please try to be more rational. Bardhylius 21:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I withdraw my threats --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

About your user page: Whether what is said on it is correct or not, it is a blatant violation of our policies as laid out at WP:USER (quote: "What may I not have on my user page? [...] Extensive personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia, [...] Extensive use of polemical statements" etc.). I'm therefore blanking it now, and I am asking you not to re-introduce polemical material like that.

Also, I must remind you that the purpose of Wikipedia is to create a politically neutral encyclopedia, and that every editor is expected to make an effort to write neutrally and not to push their own point of view. You have been rather aggressively promoting your opinions on an issue of ethnic conflict. Please stop that, or you may well end up blocked. (see here). Fut.Perf. 09:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've ignored my warnings above, and have gone on a renewed spree of making blatantly tendentious propaganda edits, I've blocked you for a short while. I'd like to hear some signal from you that you are prepared to consider what WP:NPOV means, otherwise I see no option but to ban you from all edits related to Serbia, under the rules of this arbitration decision. Fut.Perf. 21:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can freely ban me from Serbia, I have no interest about Serbia. My interest is the welfare of Vojvodina. BanatFree (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

BanatFree (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

an admin that supports pro-Serbian agenda blocked me

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=an admin that supports pro-Serbian agenda blocked me |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=an admin that supports pro-Serbian agenda blocked me |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=an admin that supports pro-Serbian agenda blocked me |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}