User talk:Bigdaddy718

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cab_forward_%28car%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Venom

Bigdaddy718 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia maybe next year maybe never

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigdaddy718 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i'm using this from a school server. why can't I edit?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. — Yamla (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigdaddy718 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This computer is open to a range of people in the school community. I'm not sure why this account was blocked at all. I'm going to assume someone was doing abusive work from within this IP range. How can this be overturned?

Decline reason:

You were blocked because checkuser has confirmed that this account is a sockpuppet account of an indefinitely blocked user, User:Armyguy11.— Rjd0060 (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP address you specified is for a residential mindspring cable user. I think it's somewhat unlikely that it's a school IP. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Ok how would i go about proving that the computers here are used by multiple people? i dont know who armyguy is but not allowing over 300 people to edit really isn't the answer based off of one rogue user.}}

We aren't blocking over 300 people; just your account, not your IP address. - Rjd0060 (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get this message.

Editing from 64.131.205.111 (your account, IP address, or IP address range) has been disabled by Nishkid64 for the following reason(s):

Same reason as before; 1 month block initially issued under the assumption that UnclePaco's IP might change. Your IP address is 64.131.205.111, and the block has been set to expire: 05:25, 14 February 2009.

It has been blocked Bigdaddy718 (talk) 21:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigdaddy718 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the above message is what is on if i'm not logged onto an account. what can be done about this? whom can i speak to? the actions of one rogue user should not affect everyone

Decline reason:

Per below. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In fact both your account and your IP address are blocked. Due to the abusive nature of the edits coming from it, it has been deemed necessary to disable account creation and anonymous editing from your IP. That being said, I am going to ask the blocking admin to look at your block again. Due to the process involved in this block, it might take some time. I apologize for the inconvenience. -- lucasbfr ^talk (using User:Lucasbfr2) 21:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could have blocked based on the editing pattern alone, since Bigdaddy718 is edit warring with TiconderogaCCB‎, just as UnclePaco had done before. Furthermore, this account was created just three days ago, yet the user is familiar with the 3RR noticeboard and sockpuppetry matters. Blnguyen ran a CheckUser request offline, and he confirmed it as a direct hit (which is clearly demonstrated by Bigdaddy718's IP block). The editing similarities and familiarity with policies is too much of a coincidence. This user is definitely UnclePaco. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 22:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. I was edit warring with Ticonderoga but I'm the only one blocked. Going thru his history he has a pattern of using sock ip's and was blocked 3 times for similiar stuff. A few of his IP's were blocked as well which increases his block total. He was edit warring with me so why is this one sided? I have used wikipedia many times in the past but was not logged on. When I tried to use it via this server I was told I was blocked thus I had to create an account. So I created an account. This account was blocked because it uses the same server as a rogue account, armyguy. Who is unclepaco now? Is this another person? this looks a lot more complicated than meets the eye. Now what similiarities are you speaking about? I am looking here [1] and I see that I edited at St. John's, I followed someone here from st john's [2] and saw they vandalised here [3]. I did a few car articles. The san francico zoo, Ashley Alexandra Dupré‎ and a few other edits. So what editing similiarities are there? Basically what it looks like is going to happen is that a ton of users won't be able to log on because they'll look like socks if they use the servers here. What can be done to resolve this? Bigdaddy718 (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i'm getting a lot of mixed messages. first i'm another user, than only my account is blocked not my ip. then i might be autoblocked, then i'm an additional user, etc. what's going on here? Bigdaddy718 (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IP was blocked because it was used abusively by UnclePaco. You are blocked because of your editing pattern (similar to UnclePaco) and the CheckUser which confirmed that you are on the same IP as UnclePaco. This IP, 64.131.205.111, is a residential IP that is most likely operated by one person. Given the situation, it's fairly obvious that you are UnclePaco. You were blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. You will keep on getting blocked in the future, whether you edit under an IP or as a registered user. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 23:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what edit pattern is similiar to unclepaco?
what happened to armyguy? why is it that i'm listed as being armyguy and you bring up unclepaco?
how can i edit from an IP or continue being blocked from it if its already blocked?
why am i blocked for an edit pattern when another user was edit warring with me and not blocked and has a history of edit warring?
i said why the IP can be the same, but this is the first account of i've made.
how can i prove that i am not said user. Bigdaddy718 (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]