Jump to content

Talk:2nd millennium BC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.246.109.131 (talk) at 21:19, 16 April 2008 (→‎Where is the NPOV dispute?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It says in both the 2nd and 3rd milleniums that the first Chinese sighting of a comet was in those milleniums. Can anyone confirm which millenium it really was?

To whoever changed all occurrences of "BC" to "BCE"

Are you aware of how many articles need to be changed? Do you have a plan? A [developer] could write a bot that could do change all of the terms automatically. Since they haven't done that, they may have a reason. - Brunnock 22:16, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Too poetic?

Does anybody else think this article is far too poetic?68.14.84.43 20:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it's both poetic and cogent I think it's fine. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 20:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think so --Antariki Vandanamu 18:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the NPOV dispute?

The page refers to a NPOV dispute and directs to the talk page. But where is the NPOV dispute here?--Antariki Vandanamu 18:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was just wondering about the same thing; given that nobody has seen fit to answer your question or otherwise provide an explanation here (which should be standard when an article or section is tagged as being disputed), I'll remove the tag. -- Schneelocke 12:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fall of Troy?

To the best of my knowledge, the existence of Troy is disuputed. It was part of a story involving gods and monsters, and there is only limited evidence that it ever even existed, let alone "fell" on a specific date. 99.246.109.131 (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]