User talk:FisherQueen
FisherQueen
| |
---|---|
![]() Assume Good FaithHi Fisher Queen, I found your comment on this page about assuming good faith so useful after seeing how you had put: {{dated prod|concern = {{fq-prod}}|month = April|day = 11|year = 2008|time = 15:22|timestamp = 20080411152235}} on the Gordon Tait. But I would be grateful if you could spend a moment to explain why you put this up two minutes after the page had got started and when it new additions were still being added. Whilst I feel that the admonition to assume good faith is such a wonderful pillar if the wikipedia community, it sometimes concerns me that this assumption is abused by people who unnecessarily put such tags onn pages where the cyber-ink is scarcely dry. No doubt you have a good reason to explain this behaviour and look forward to heaing it. Harrypotter (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Orangemike edits![]() Please learn to separate factual edits from vandalism. The edits made from this IP address were merely factual edits to Orangemike's page to reflect Orangemike's sudden fame resulting from his mention on the Toucher and Rich show. Deleting factual edits constitutes vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.104.249.90 (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Removal of NPOV tagWhy the removal of the tags? Please explain? J. D. Redding 16:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The users making POV edits in question have attacked me. What options do I have? One has stalked me. The users also work in tandum. This is not new conduct for either user. We have had conflicts before. ScienceApologist has been sanctioned by arbitrattion committe. Mabey both have been, but I do not seek the contributors out .. they do ... I am sorry you seem not to know anything about the subject. The article is biased now. Is there anothertag I can use? last questions here ... Why must someone other than me restore the tag? Is that a requirement to place a NPOV tag ... to have a second motion to keep it? J. D. Redding 16:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC) No comment? J. D. Redding 16:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I guess not .... J. D. Redding 16:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I hate being stalked by ScienceApologist. Anyways, removing relevant reliable information from the article makes many articles biased. Omission of facts. I find it surprising that i use the same criteria for many articles i have done and improved (ex, expert, scientist, etc ...) ... but only when he edits science articles I have been editing, information is removed. POV pushing and attacks on me also. A tag should be there. Tag to clarify that there is not inforantion is absent in the topic. How is anyone to know that there are reliable sources of information (government documents and patents) and other information (for other public sources) if it is removed? Removing different sources of knowledge is not representing all them. Thanks ... Sincerely, J. D. Redding 05:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC) (ps., people need to learn the historical method and apply it to all types of sources ...) Unhelpful commentHuh,i never said im an admin. -.- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasaa (talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Blocking, Judge FloroHi, are you still an administrator? I just want to COMPLAIN and NOTIFY you about a threat to block my user (I am not familiar how to deal with this guy and vandalism). I was emailed by some editors per private message that many Filipino editors were out to muscle me and to ban me, due to my prophecies, inter alia. I told them that WikiPedia is merely one of 140 forums and places I registered and joined (I was banned in 20 wiccans and atheist forums), and I don't care if guys are stupid and unruly. I debunked FEAR in my life. I have high respects to you, since I knew you were so impartial, and when you helped in re-creating [[Florentino Floro]. But this User:Maxschmelling. User talk:Maxschmelling had been pestering me[1] on Philippine news editing. He had gone wild, and he even deleted my modern wrist watch record auction from Reuters news. I ignored him since he must have had a family mess or job crisis, inter alia. I discern and let these go. Is this guy an administrator? He claimed that he is not a Filipino and not related to Filipino but has lots of fear to show his nationality. I had used WikiPedia Psalm 109 and 73 since when I read Wiki rules, I could not defend myself against vendetta or cover-up and hidden agenda by editors and administrators who were out to muscle me, for reasons, as personal defense based on Bible and spirituality, since the world is full of rage. Please enlighten me on the power of this guy to block and to threaten to block when all my edits are not news. And what is my remedy against him? Can you block him? Thanks. --Florentino floro (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
SkylurkerHello again. I was the one who added the speedy delete tag to the skylurker page. I have had a conversation on [[User_talk:BananaFiend|my talk page] with User:skylurker. I tagged with speedy delete as nonsense, which seems to indicate that the article does not make any sense. While I believe that it did not have any place on wikipedia (and could be speedy deleted as such) I think it more properly was deletable as a personal theory (non-notable). The user seems relatively personable and I think the "nonsense" message might have been a bit insulting. I think perhaps in future I will edit the user notification added by twinkle automatically to be a little less harsh where necessary. Any advice on this one? Sorry to bother you BananaFiend (talk) 09:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
HELPNeed help at Shannara....Multiple vandals....who all happen to be my friends too. UGH. (Try not to block me too, but if you do, oh well. the_ed17 18:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Haggis editingI really think the people on here should lighten up. Stating a Haggis is a Ginger and hairy with 2 legs longer than other, they are often seen running around hills. Very shy fury animals, which when skinned make traditional Scottish cuisine, was mearly fun. Crikey what sad people you must be to be offended —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samismarried (talk • contribs) 22:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
adding medical videos to wikipediahey i'm really suprised by this. we do a tv show online that makes absolutely zero money. we do it for educational purposes only for the benefit of doctors and patients out there. we dont sell anything. i added a video of a show we did with the most respected man in the vitamin industry talking about the importance of quality control in the vitamimn industry. its just like a jazzy seminar. if i am going about doing it the wrong way i would appreciate input on how to do it right. i created a new section titled "educational video" and put the episode there. we pay for our own bandwidth, we dont have tile adds, we are just trying to help educate the world... |