SN 1006

Supernova SN 1006
	File:Sn1006.jpg
Event type	Supernova, supernova remnant, astronomical radio source, astrophysical X-ray source
	Type Ia
Date	May 1 1006
Constellation	Lupus
Right ascension	15h 2m8s
Declination	-41° 57′
Epoch	?
Galactic coordinates	G.327.6+14.6
Distance	7200 light-years, 2.2 kpc
Remnant	Shell
Host	Milky Way
Progenitor	Unknown
Progenitor type	Unknown
Colour (B-V)	some sources cite; yellowish at visible spectrum
Notable features	Brightest supernova in recorded; history, and therefore most ; described of the pre-; telescopic era
Peak apparent magnitude	-7.5
Other designations	SN 1006, SN 1006A, SN 1016, SNR G327.6+14.6, SNR G327.6+14.5, 1ES 1500-41.5, MRC 1459-417, XSS J15031-4149, PKS 1459-41, AJG 37, 4U 1458-41, 3U 1439-39, 2U 1440-39, MSH 14-4-15, PKS 1459-419, PKS J1502-4205
	Related media on Commons
	[edit on Wikidata]

SN 1006 was a supernova, widely seen on Earth beginning in the year 1006 AD; Earth was about 7200 light-years away. It was the brightest apparent magnitude stellar event in recorded history. First appearing in the constellation of Lupus between April 30 and May 1 of that year, this "guest star" was described by observers in Switzerland, Egypt, Iraq, China, Japan, and possibly North America.

Historic description

The Chinese and Arabic astronomers have left the most complete historical descriptions of the supernova.

According to Songshi in the section of 56 and 461, the star was seen on May 1, 1006 which appeared to the south of constellation Di, east of Lupus and one degree to the west of Centaurus. It was equal to that of half a moon and shone so brightly that the objects on ground could be seen [i.e. at night]. During September, it went below the horizon following the rotation of the heavens. By December, it was again sighted in the constellation Di. The Chinese astrologer Zhou Keming, who was on his return to Kaifeng from his duty in Guangdong, interpreted the star to the emperor on May 30 as an auspicious star, yellow in colour and brilliant in its brightness, that would bring great prosperity to the state over which it appeared.

The Egyptian Arabic astronomer and astrologer, Ali ibn Ridwan, writing in a commentary on Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, has left us another historical description of the supernova. He says that the object was 2-1/2 to three times as large as the disc of Venus, and about one-quarter the brightness of the Moon, and, like all other observers, says that the star was low on the southern horizon. Monks at the Benedictine abbey at St. Gallen broadly corroborate bin Ridwan's observations as to magnitude and location in the sky, additionally writing that "[i]n a wonderful manner this was sometimes contracted, sometimes diffused, and moreover sometimes extinguished." This last is often taken as proof that the supernova was of Type Ia. Some sources state that the star was bright enough to cast shadows; it was certainly seen during daylight hours for some time, and the modern-day astronomer Frank Winkler has said that "in the spring of 1006, people could probably have read manuscripts at midnight by its light."

There appear to have been two distinct phases in the early evolution of this supernova. There was first a three-month period at which it was at its brightest; after this period it diminished, then returned for a period of about eighteen months. Most astrologers interpreted the event as a portent of warfare and famine.

A petroglyph of the Hohokam has been discovered which may be the first known North American representation of the supernova. ^[2]

The Supernova Remnant of SN 1006

The associated supernova remnant from this explosion was not identified until 1965, when Doug Milne and Frank Gardner used the Parkes radio telescope to demonstrate that the previously known radio source PKS 1459-41, near the star Beta Lupi, had the appearance of a 30-arcminute circular shell.[2] Over the next few years, both X-ray and optical emission from this remnant were also detected. The supernova remnant of SN 1006 has an estimated distance of 2.2 kiloparsecs, making it approximately 20 parsecs in diameter. As expected for the remnant of a Type Ia supernova, no associated neutron star or black hole has been found.

References

^ Winkler, P. Frank (2003). "The SN 1006 Remnant: Optical Proper Motions, Deep Imaging, Distance, and Brightness at Maximum". The Astrophysical Journal. 585: 324–335. doi:10.1086/345985.
^ [1]

External links

[1] Winkler, P. Frank (2003). "The SN 1006 Remnant: Optical Proper Motions, Deep Imaging, Distance, and Brightness at Maximum". The Astrophysical Journal. 585: 324–335. doi:10.1086/345985.

[2] [1]

[1]

[2]