Talk:Claymore

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Size and popular fiction?

The article describes claymores as being up to around 140 cm long. But I have an impression that in popular culture and fiction, the claymore tends to be depicted as a very large sword, as long as a man or longer.

Does anyone else agree?

If sources can be found, this this misconception (if it exists outside my twisted imagination) ought to be mentioned in the article. SpectrumDT (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also believed Claymores to be large swords, however maybe that was just another very popular rumour. User:Willski72 92.12.241.36 (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, was very surprised to see the description of these swords. I grew up very much around Scottish culture, festivals, and traditions. The account of claymores, that I was always told by the 'clan elders' was roughly as follows:

"It was a wide, two-handed, broad sword of about seven feet in length. To wield it, one would use a side-sweeping motion in the same manner as a farmer uses a scythe. The purpose of this sword was to cut off ( or otherwise disable ) the front legs of a cavalry horse. Thus wounded, the horse would collapse and the riding knight would fall to the ground, possibly being stunned or trapped by the horse. The Scotsman or a nearby kinsman would then approach with a shorter weapon, like a dirk or an axe, and finish the fallen knight off."

Ruthless, but effective.

It could be used to disembowel infantry, as well, of course, but its primary raison d'être was to counteract cavalry. Granted, it is possible, that these stories were merely folklore; I cannot give documented sources. But I offer it up for discussion, anyways. 71.126.9.229 (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

I have removed the following sentences, for it has been unreferenced for quite a while, and most sources I have seen give the "claidheamh mòr" derivation.

However, another theory suggests it may come from claidheamh da lamh, literally "two-hand sword." Claidheamh is ultimately cognate with Latin gladius.^{[citation needed]} As such the use of the term 'claymore' for the two-handed sword is debatable.

If anyone has a source for the "other theory", by all means put it back. Lesgles (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

two-handed?

While I too assumed the claymore to be two-handed, this definition in the Oxford English Dictionary gave me pause:

Hist. The two-edged broadsword of the ancient Scottish Highlanders. Also (inexactly, but very commonly) the basket-hilted broadsword introduced in 16th c., which was frequently single-edged. (The claymore was not, except in extraordinary instances, two-handed.)

If any one knows the facts, it would be nice to have a reference. Lesgles (talk) 01:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]