Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fart fetish

Fart fetish

Unreferenced, does not assert notability or cite reliable sources, and appears to be original research. An article about the same thing was deleted in 2006 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fart fetishism (2)) however there was a previous AFD with "keep" result. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 22:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources under this title nor under the more "medical" name of Eproctophilia (which I learned from Encyclopedia Dramatica). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete until reliable sources can be found, either under this name, or "Eproctophilia". --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 22:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without any meaningful research content, I think it can go.
—MarionTheLibrarian (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete let this one blow in the wind. JuJube (talk) 00:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shaking the Delete aerosol Without proper referencing, it would appear to fail WP:N. --Ecoleetage (talk) 07:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hoax. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless and until there is some sourced content to go in it. --Simon Speed (talk) 22:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Without any sources, it's quite silent but deadly. Squidfryerchef (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC) I have resource material on this subject, doubt-free sexual studies research, but I am a novice on Wikipedia, totally geek, how can I can post my research reference here???[reply]