User talk:Contorebel

Padraig McKearney questions

Hi, I've posted some questions about the Padraig McKearney article on its talk page. Would you mind having a look? Cheers, Jdorney 02:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Padraig_McKearney.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Padraig_McKearney.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Padraig mckearney1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Padraig mckearney1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article of possible interest

Hi. I've nominated Mairéad Farrell for peer review and thought you might be interested in having a look at it and giving me your opinion. Thanks in advance!GiollaUidir 01:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the descrition Volunteer

I thought you would be interested to see the following discussion where we are debating the use of the term volunteer as a member of the IRA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28Ireland-related_articles%29#IRA_articles:_usage_of_the_word_.22volunteer.22 Vintagekits 16:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Patrick kelly.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:Image:Patrick kelly.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Image:Patrick kelly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TeckWizBot 02:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

I liked a lot of your edits - very inciteful! Are you going to stick around this time?--Vintagekits 14:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always around, be it in the shadows or not. I react when I feel there's a need.--Contorebel 14:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like the good Contro that you are!! A cahara, I am going to try and write a good article about Patrick "Pat" Kelly, East Tyrone Brigade - one that does not just focus on his murder at Loughall, would you be willing to help?--Vintagekits 14:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely help. I was a little ticked when they removed his article. The guy was the commander of the most elite IRA Brigade of the mid eighties, surely that entitles him to an article.--Contorebel 14:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well we still have the history from that article as it was only merged. I am going to set up a new page for him on the {{WP:IR}} project page and work from there. Send me an email via my user page and I will send you some links on him.--Vintagekits 14:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A chara, I didnt realise you were a Croat!--Vintagekits (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's right. I had it written down, but it was only yesterday that I put up a few userboxes.--Contorebel 13:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it said you lived in Zagreb, but I thought you must have ~~escaped~~ emmigrated from Ireland.--Vintagekits (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Dan Keating.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dan Keating.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Thuresson 19:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Thuresson 19:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tony-Gormley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tony-Gormley.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for edits to Rutilio Grande

Very nice additions to what was an overly skimpy article on such an important figure. I've often felt bad I haven't expanded that article more than I have, so it's reassuring to see other editors take up the work, which is part of the whole Wikipedia notion. Lawikitejana (talk) 23:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish and amazigh support for zionism

Hello, i would like to know why you reverted this information. Kurdish and amazigh support for Zionism is existent and a source was supplied - albit with a problem of technicallity. this was discussed in the talk page. it would have been more courteous to leave a message in the talk page and/or provide a reason for the revert. 12:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

My apologies, it wasn't my intention to revert the information itself, I was focused on the fact that the entire lower part of the article was missing (from Footnotes downward).--Contorebel 18:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, don't sweat it. I-P stuff makes some people go a bit twitchy. i just wanted to make sure it was a mistake indeed before trying to return the information. insofar almost none of my I-P edits have been reverted, something i'm quite proud of :) 85.64.228.215 (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]