User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Ann Angel

I added a page for a real person named Ann Angel but it was deleted before I had a chance to explain why she should be here.

I know she's not as popular as Jenna Jameson or Jesse Capelli but Anna still has a very loyal fan following and in my opinion deserves to be here at Wikipedia. I was also going to add a profile photo but since I'm a new member it wouldn't allow me.

Marcus7171 (talk) 20:47 May 25 2008 (UTC)

The clown statue

I might of misunderstood, but you said that clown statue did not contain any noticable resources. I did, infact, say that it could be source for coulrophobia in some people and that it is told on some web-sites. Like I said, I could of just misunderstood.--C.R.Stinnett (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics —Preceding unsigned comment added by Techjcg (talk • contribs) 05:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And how does that apply to a work of fiction? —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ATA Virtual Deleted

I started an article about ATAVirtual, but it was deleted before I could really get anything onto it. Could we please have a little more time to add to it? ATAVirtual (talk) 23:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

I noticed the message you recently left to User talk:Evan210. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 22:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing viewpoint: You are being quite nice to that guy who created the hoax, nicer than I was. I shouldn't be editing today since I'm not in the best of moods. Thanks for inadvertently knocking some sense back into my noggin. Have a cookie, Fred. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Not at all. My central air at home went out...and I live in the desert. Been staying with my folks the last couple of days. It is a whopping 118 degrees here in Palm Springs. Or, if you will, 48C. At least it's a dry heat, as we're fond of quipping out here. That and the compressor is under warranty. Unfortunately, the labor is not. Taking a serious chunk out of the pocketbook. So, now ya know. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Went in today and it was up over 100 inside according to the two-digit digital thermometer on the thermostat. It read "00" and later "01." The tech is cutting me a break on the labor cost and working with me on paying him for it. The doggoned compressor would have been north of $1600 if I had to buy it. Big ouch. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Montana

Hello Fred ! I added a new person named Joe Montana (musician). Could you link these 3 Joe Montana's properly now, so that they are visible when it comes down to their name ? -- Prunk (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok , I see that you sorted it, thank you ! -- Prunk (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assist

Thanks for reverting the un-archive of Talk:Ford FE engine, and for handling the spurious vandalism report. The IP editor you reverted (and whose AIV report you cancelled) has been a real problem-child type for quite awhile. I and others have put considerable time and effort into explaining how we do things on Wikipedia to him/her, with many links to the relevant policies, protocols, essays, etc., all to no avail. S/he seems bound and determined to feel persecuted and make trouble. I wish there were an effective way to proactively limit the damage and mayhem people like this cause, particularly where it is reasonably apparent that the editor is avoiding registering in order to circumvent enforcement of the rules. Oh well...I guess all we can do in response to persistent mess-makers is to keep on moppin' up their messes! Thanks again. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: iPod touch Fans

Thanks for your help and suggestions with this section. Luckily, I saved the wiki text of the article I was working on so I'l work on it on my user page, as you suggested. How will I be able to get it moved over later? Cruelio1998 (talk) 06:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Help with Gabriel Murphy Article

Hello C.Fred- thanks for the help with the Gabriel Murphy article. I would like to suggest that you remove the protection status from Gabriel Murphy and allow me the opportunity to expand on the article, this will also allow those who want to have input on the current Deletion Review to be able to see the article so they can render an informed opinion. Lastly, putting the reidrect aside, I would hope you would agree that the article does establish notability on its own and does not need to have a redirect to the aplus article. THanks for your time and consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LakeBoater (talk • contribs) 18:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the requested clarification on the Deletion Review. LakeBoater (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello C.Fred- thanks much for your comments and direction on the Gabriel Murphy article including your suggestions on re-writing the article. I have taken a considerable amount of time to make sure everything I possibly can is cited by independent sources. I now have 42 total references and I think over a dozen different sources. I would like to take you up on your invitation to review the article before opening a deletion review. If you can review it and leave me a message with your thoughts as to whether you feel it is solid and therefore we can go ahead and open a deletion review (I will take you up on your offer to open a deletion discussion). Thanks again so much for your help.

The article is located at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LakeBoater/Gabriel_Murphy LakeBoater (talk) 06:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C.Fred- did you get a chance to review the new Gabriel Murphy article? Thanks! :) LakeBoater (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This is User:Tm93. I had recently tagged Shaka Laka Boom Boom (Indian Drama serial) for deltion. I know that I forgot to put a reason, but User:Umerfhussain (the creator) removed the tag himself. I'm not an admin, but you are; therefore I'm asking for your counsel. Only admins are allowed to remove the tag. It no longer is too much of problem now that RHaworth has nominated it, for the reason I meant to write, but that's not my point. I just wish that User:Umerfhussain be notified that only admins are allowed to remove tags. He removed it himself and he is the creator. Click here to see the history for the page. He/she might create another article that does need to be deleted, it gets tagged, he/she removes the tag, no article is deleted. I love to see wikipedia grow, I just think that it should be done by the rules.

P.S. I'm really not trying to be rude, but User:Umerfhussain needs to be notified.

—Tm93 (talk) 08:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the templates. I didn't know the template for warning other users. Thank You for that info. Question. How come on the page's history it doesn't show that I proposed it for deletion? If I could see an older verision of that page then I could see how my reson was not rationale. I would like to be an every now and then new page patroller. To do this properly I need to learn from my mistakes.Tm93 (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An IP you blocked has returned

Hello. I have noticed an IP with a dubious history adding false info into numerous pages. A hard one to catch since occasionally the edits seem valid. But those are rare. See User:70.138.106.139. The last block issued (and there have been a few) came from you. Just wondering if you had time to re-visit and perhaps weigh-in a heftier vacation for this troublesome anon. Thanks, cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 22:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amalgam Digital

hey i got your email about the Speedy Deletion. im new to all this so i was wondering if and how i go about the process to resubmit but with the valid citations needed to add the page. thanks again for keeping me informed. Amaldigi (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]