Wikipedia:Editor review/Leonard^Bloom

Leonard^Bloom*

Leonard^Bloom (talk · contribs) Although pretty new to Wikipedia and having a relatively low edit count, I would love to get some feedback on my current work. I know I need to use more edit summaries, but feel free to harp on me for that; I could certainly use the repetition and reminder. Leonard^Bloom (talk) 02:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Taking a focus on article-writing (and the subject you enjoy covering!) would help broaden your experience on Wikipedia and make it more rewarding. New stubs can become Did You Know candidates, and if you're game enough, go for a featured article. Keep up on your vandal-patrolling, though! - Mailer Diablo 15:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read up on WP:CSD and WP:N more, and get a better idea of what is considered encyclopedic. I've only seen a bit of your speedy work, but it's not very good. Wizardman 02:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've done an excellent job with your huggle reverts. Keep it up!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace is good (but should add edit summaries more often ;-) ); I don't hang around XfD enough to comment on that. I agree with Mailer diablo that it's good to expand your horizons. I'd like to see how you do in a dispute, and maybe how you solve one :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 03:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're a WikiGnome, but I suggest that you try to focus on article-building a bit more. You're Huggle reverts are phenomenal, but (especially if you want to be an admin) a lot of editors would prefer to see more content-adding and a little less vandal-reversion. Also, try to edit more in the Project: space, that always helps. Cheers, and good luck! --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 18:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take it easy on the Huggle and do some real editing. 71.112.10.248 (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have enjoyed your contributions to the AfD discussions, and you have a good eye for spotting articles that deserve to get Speedy Deleted. Keep up the fine work. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I tried to delete what was obviously a fake fact and a joke from a page, Leonard^Bloom told me twice that I was vandalising. Please take the time to read what I was deleting!

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

I'm pretty pleased with my anti-vandal work, and my work on the cancer dictionary, and although most articles I made for the dictionary were stubs, I like to think to tell myself that it's better than nothing (denial :D ). The anti-vandal work is pretty solid though.

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

I haven't been in any conflicts, though I see them all the time. Honestly, I've done very little communication on talk pages and such. As for how I would deal them, it would probably be an effort to maintain a civil disposition and a sense of empathy.