Talk:Never Back Down

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Never Back Down article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film Unassessed

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mixed martial arts Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mixed martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Mixed martial artsmixed martial arts articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Edited Plot section

OK, I went in and reduced the Plot section to about 60% of its previous length. Was I too severe, or does more need to be removed? Signed responses considered. (yes I'm a snob)Lincoln muadib (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This film had to have been sued

Honestly this is so obviously a fight club knock off it had to have been sued. It only serves to get a legitimate sport a bad rap. It is glorified street brawling dressed as MMA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.7.82 (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an area for discusion of the movie, there are numerous boards and sites for that. This page is for the discusion of the wikipedia page and ways to improve the page. Aml830 (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC) ill sue u inabit m8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.214.99 (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous plot idea

Instead of going through a huge fight for his honor, why doesn;t he just call the police, and have this guy arrested for repeat beatings, attempted murder, etcetera? I mean he almost got killed, and the generic girl eh tries to win from the bad guyh says he hurts her. they'll probably make some excuse like they pay off the police...awful..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.246.246 (talk) 04:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a work of fiction, not an accurate depiction of life (see monomyth). Although I agree it seems like a very poorly strung together plot. I also agree that the talk page is for the discussion of how to improve the article, and not for discussing the subject of the article itself. Thank you. Calgary (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Songs in Advertisements

Stop with 'Headstrong' by Trapt. It all started with '...To Be Loved' by Papa Roach. Now many songs are being used in the film's advertisements. 'Headstrong' is not the sole song usage for the film. MeanChe (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Review in Article

Seems to me we have a user review in the middle of the article. I posted a POV. Matthew Glennon (talk) 21:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC

==Vandalism==.,n.,

vandalmalism Im deleting this from the critical reception becouse it is obviosly a vandalism

"This movie was great Critics do nothing but try to act like they actually know shit and the do nothing but sit in the offices and masturbate to horrible movies that only people that have alzheimers like because they can't remember how bad they really are fucking douchebags."

Please say this in forums. Hakwam (talk) 04:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC) HAKWAM[reply]

Even better, don't say it even in forums, I don't need the mental image . . . *grins*Lincoln muadib (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't explain it, I'll revert it

OK, I asked the question here if I went too far or not far enough in reducing the "Plot" section to smaller size (see the top paragraph). The same unsigned user, however, ignored this and just went right in 5 times and readded what I consider unnecessary, clogging information. So I went in to revert.

I am happy to discuss changes, but unsigned, unexplained reverts to quagmired, overlong Plot sections I will revert- then explain my actions here. If this seems a touch macho It is not meant to. Lincoln muadib (talk) 23:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote this?

Seems like a 14 year old boy wrote this awful movie. a dont tink so lad dis iz an amazing film showing da arts ufc/mma and shows dat u rr all rong an i am right .

This is Actually written by some schmo who's only other writing credit was Homeward Bound 2 (he only converted the book into a screenplay, didn't come up with the story)