User talk:Dr.Oak
|
re: edits to Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois)
First off, let me welcome you to Wikipedia! I see that this is your first time editing (at least under this user name).
I wanted to come over and personally explain why I recently reverted your edits to this article.
One of the most important policies to Wikipedia is its policy on verifiability. Anything added to an article should be attributable to a third party, neutral, reliable source (see Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Anything that is not attributed is subject to being deleted if challenged.
There were also a few edits that you made that, through no fault of yours, unfortunately don't come out right when the editing is completed. For example: adding things like "Midwestern United States" and "Cook County" ... while certainly correct, end up becoming a part of the school's mailing address when presented in the final article. I wish I could change it, but there is no easy way to do so. Also "mascot" refers to the name of a character, while nickname refers to the team's nickname "Friars".
Some of the things you added regarding the school's history were really very good, and I hope you will re-add them, if a source can be found for them. I would be happy to help you format the citations, if you need help with that.
One last thing: This article is currently pending a review with the WikiSchools project folks. I did not do all that much work here (a lot was done before I ever got here), but I think this article is on the verge or receiving a very strong review. I would like to see the article rated well, but that does mean that unattributed material has to be kept to a bare minimum.
If you have any questions, please let me know. I wish you the best of luck on your editing. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
I also thought I would roll out the red carpet. There are some links that can lead you to some answers to questions. Again, best of luck! LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I wanted to update you on a few things:
- 1. I submitted the article for peer review. This is a normal prerequisite for the article to be bumped up to a GA. I think this article must be so close, that I decided to put in the request.
- 2. There was something you commented on earlier regarding fees and tuition. If there is something about mandatory (or optional fees) that should probably be added in a separate section. I ran across this when I was working on another article ... an editor who was assessing the article.
- 3. I added another picture of an alum, but am searching for a picture of Pat Quinn. So far, I can find one on the Illinois government website, but sine it is not a federal website, it is not necessarily in the public domain. I will continue researching this.
- The article continues to improve. I think you have done great work. LonelyBeacon (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Something to throw out to you
By wikipedia's definition: any one who attended the school, even if they did not graduate is considered an alumnus (it weird ... it is not how I would necessarily define it). As long as his attendance at the school can be confirmed, it is accepted that the person be considered an alumnus. LonelyBeacon (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
Another obvious sockpuppet of the Mctrain/societyfinalclub group again trying to insert suspect info and claiming "it all checks out". Identical edits and topics. Reviewing admins let me know if there are any questions or take a look at User:Barneca/watch/societyfinalclubs. --Leivick (talk) 03:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Excuse me sir, your acusations are nothing more than that, and yes, the sourcing on the version I pulled up all checks out, Spretti comes up on a google search, the others are links or books with ISBN's- go check for yourself. I asked you for a rational explantion for why an article that is properly sourced is being reverted, and why I, and I suspect several others, are being blocked for being intellegent.Dr.Oak (talk) 03:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)