User talk:IJA

User talk:Ijanderson977 Welcome to my talk page! If you leave me a message, I'll try to respond to it as soon as possible. I'll usually respond on your talk page so that you'll get a "new messages" notice. Click here to leave a new message. To send me an Email click here. This page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox or Netscape. For God's sake, don't use Internet Explorer!!! Insult He has insulted you more occasions. You can report him and use his insults towards me as support. But I just don't want to go through that process. --Tocino 21:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC) Re. Insults User admonished. Please report any further, eventual incivility. Thank you for contacting me. Regards, Húsönd 21:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) Who are you talking about?Max Mux (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Re:URL 1:0 I'm not good in that... As for me URL=link. Taamu (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Re: fixin' POV Excelent work, Ian. I was beginning to lose faith in humanity. On Ukraine: Remember the well-formed, well-sourced proposed replacement with Julia Tymoszenko's latest statements? That should be retrieved from the archives. It's would have been in hte article, had A/T not blocked consensus. In any case, read carefully what is on the page right now, and convince yourself that the source for O.B. from the V.Rada strictly relates to a conference in February, and is completely deprecated. It should be tossed. The other statements are not Ukraine's, either, unlike Slovakia's. And theyh are noncommittal. Julia Tymoshenko's statements, being relatively recent, are the most useful. In any case, all she is saying, is that they will carefully consider it. It might be worthwhile to hunt up some more recent Ukrainian statements. I'm sure that after Georgia War, they are more likely to say something more about Kosovo, one way or another. Note that DaQurin already asked that India's write-up be put in line with the official communiques of that foreign ministry. If India ever wants to use as strong anti-Kosovo language as Russia uses, they sure can and will. But they have not, not counting what is attirbuted by the Serbian sources to Indian ambassador in Serbia, which as you can extrapolate, is rather unreliable, what with his role being keepiing channels open and cooperation going between India and his host country. We need ot bring this write-up conservatively in line with known Indian MFA stance. Ditto for China. The alternative to the above always was, and I said so, forgetting ascribing reactions to states, and explicitly collecting all prominent individual persons's reactions, then grouping them by country of origin. But we haven't done that, and you can't have your cake and eat it too. :) Best, --Mareklug talk 16:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Chat I'm online. Canadian Bobby (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Inappropriate comments on the talkpage of the International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence article Hello, ljanderson977. For your information, I have deleted several comments made by you and two other users from the talkpage of the article mentioned above per WP:FORUM. Please keep your discussions on article talk pages devoted to improvement of the article and not general discussion. Thank you. AVandtalkcontribs 22:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Hi, ljanderson, thanks for the reply. Warnings are usually placed on individual user pages and not on article talk pages, again per WP:FORUM. Kind regards, AVandtalkcontribs 22:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Hi again, ljanderson977. Yet again, Wikipedia is not a forum and the comments made by you and the two other users violate the policy. If you want to make sure that the other user understands why he has been warned, please provide a diff of the revision or a link to the revision itself in the text of the warning given. Striking your edits does not make any difference in this particular case. I will have to revert your edit for the last time and if you will still be unhappy with it, feel free to revert it. In case you do, I will ask an administrator for advice so he can help us settle the dispute. P.S. Noone prevents you from posting the warning on the usertalk pages of all the users involved. Cheers, AVandtalkcontribs 22:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Diff of the revert here. Feel free to revert again if you disagree. AVandtalkcontribs 22:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Removal of neutrality disputed tag Before removing the tag on International recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in regards to the opening statement, this needs to be discussed here, as the statement does not take into account the POV of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Russia and Nicaragua; with undoubtedly more to follow. A statement from the UN from April does not cut it when the article is in relation to recognition from August. We need to strive for WP:NPOV on all articles, in which all POVs are presented with balance, and that statement is totally NPOV. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)