User talk:CLinden

Welcome!

Hello, CLinden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Absentis 12:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Linden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Linden.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you agree to release this image under a free license such as GFDL, which would permit re-use for any purpose (including commerical purposes), then we cannot use it on Wikipedia. To release the image copyright as GFDL, please put {{GFDL}} on the image description page. If you release the image as GFDL, you of course retain personality rights, and may also wish to add {{personality rights}} to the image description page. Please copy text as you see it when reading the page, not as seen in the edit window. Thank you. --Deskana (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Image:Linden.jpg as it is now redundant to Image:Charles Linden.jpg. I also added {{personality rights}} to the page. Thank you for your image. --Deskana (talk) 09:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Remarks

You really need to stop accusing me of maleficence. Please comment on my edits, and not on me. Your comments on the Charles Linden talk page border on harrasment.

Start being civil, or I will do my best to get you banned. Have a nice day. Absentis 14:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmm :) Somebody vanished Elmao 10:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Charles Linden, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Jauerback 20:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Hello, CLinden. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Colliver55 (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 'conflict of interests'. The material being posted is wrong. It is not factual. It contains malice and is not a valid Linden Method review. Wikipedia is not a forum for malice but for truth... whoever heard of an encyclopedia of untruths. This is where Wikipedia falls over.