Jump to content

User talk:Jakezing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chairhat (talk | contribs) at 12:39, 7 October 2008 (Threats: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rules for my talkpage.

  • 1: if you wanna ask me about something, ask in the ??? section
  • 2: anything else add in the other catagory.
  • 3: new sections will be sub sected into the approp. catagory.
  • 4: if your a mod, don't bother posting.
  • 5: if you'v come to talk about rules with me, don't expect much, i know the rules, and im tired of telling you idiots that, leave me alone about it, and go fix the bigger problems.
  • 6: as this is my talkpage, i reserve the right to remove comments as it's my space.

other section

Re. Talk:Georgia

Hello Jakezing. I have granted semi protection and full move protection to Georgia. That shall halt any further unilateral disruption. But I must ask you to please observe WP:CIVIL, a policy which you have transgressed several times at that article's talk page. Incivility never contributes to the positive evolution of a discussion nor to help reach any agreements. Try to stay calm. Thanks. Regards, Húsönd 04:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Jakezing. I couldn't respond to you on the tal;k page cause it's protected. With regards to the comments I made about the UN being carefull cause of Russia's military strength. You said that Russia is not in the strong position and I agree 100% with you. However my point was that the 4th largest military in the world would not be subdued with out tremendous loss of life on either side. The UN would be wanting to avoid that bloodshed even though the UNSC would win said conflict if it were to occur. At the moment we are reading about an isolated conflict I was merely voicing the fact that if accusations like "invasion" were bandied around we could be reading about something far worse and a few thousand dead in Georgia would be the least of our problems. I hope this cleared any confusion there was between us210.215.75.4 (talk) 05:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand your request, what exactly is the admin intervention you believe is needed? By the way, my username is "Húsönd", not "hudson". Regards, Húsönd 19:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you used the word anarchy incorrectly. Zazaban (talk) 04:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was a joke

Russian is the most beautiful and flexible language in the world. What I said was said as a joke. I am a Russian myself. Kostan1 (talk) 22:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't get the s's thing. Kostan1 (talk) 22:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, you came into my user page, I don't even know you. Kostan1 (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP 81

hes well annoying, seen his comments on my talk page, quite funny to be fair lol. Ask an admin to block him or something Ijanderson (talk) 21:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like to apologize for my behavior. Max Mux (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My name

I typed it in on Google and I didn't find anything dirty. Tocino is Spanish for bacon. My family used to run a bacon and ham processing company. --Tocino 02:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me :) --Tocino 02:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grigory Leps

Hi there, Jakezing! Please refrain from restoring notability tag in the Grigory Leps article. This gentleman really is notable in Russia and former USSR countries. Try typing his name on YouTube and watching a few of his videos to get a taste of his music. Asking your parents or teenage friends at school about some singer's notability and then using their opinion as proof is not really encyclopedic, you have to admit it. KNewman (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility

Hello Jakezing. It was brought to my attention that you have been transgressing WP:CIVIL/WP:NPA lately. It is my duty to admonish you and ask you to please refrain from such behavior, even if provoked. Thank you. Regards, Húsönd 21:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jakezing, I have received complaints of renewed incivility from you. If you keep transgressing WP:CIVIL, I will be forced to block you. Please observe WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA at all times. Thank you. Húsönd 17:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Oops, sorry Jakezing, I had read your other message a while ago but something distracted me and I forgot to reply. You cannot forbid a user from editing your talk page, so no it's not vandalism if he continues. However, if someone is editing your talk page with the clear purpose to annoy you or harass you, then you can bring that to the attention of an administrator, or even report at WP:ANI. In that case, bear in mind that strong evidence of your complaint will be requested. Now, as for your other message, I do not agree that English is hard to learn. Of course that the level of difficulty in learning a language depends on the native language of the learner (e.g. a speaker of Dutch will almost certainly find English much easier to learn than, let's say, a speaker of Malagasy), but still English is probably among the easiest languages in the world to learn to speak up to an intermediate level. but if one wants to master English, then that's a different story. English may have a rather simple grammar, but it has a huge vocabulary with words for everything. Then there's just too many idioms, too many phrasal verbs, too many prepositions, too many everything else. Regards, Húsönd 03:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our problem

Please let us talk.Max Mux (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let us do it.Max Mux (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like to work normal with you. What do you hve against me?84.134.118.38 (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy

What you chatting? Ijanderson (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Oh hello

Hello there Mr. FÜnfzehn jahre alt. Nice to hear from you. Missle attack? My goodness. Let's be positive. Who on earth would do that? SAC is mainly some sort of deterrent. The base is probably the safest place on earth. Sorry for the noise. There is so much to do on Wikipedia, isn't there? You'll see more of me on the Roman Empire article gradually. I guess that is my way of saying, it needs a lot of work yet. But basically I'm saying a lot of Internet arguing and insulting went on over that article and in spite of all that nothing ever came of it! It certainly is easy to confront people, isn't it? The trick is to get a good article and that often is not so easy. It is not the easy way out. If we want a good article there we need to do the work - finding and referencing the sources, making sure the words are the right ones, making best use of our article space. Work not confrontation gets things done. I usually work on articles a little at a time but gradually you will see some changes. Best wishes and I hope working on Wikipedia will lead to positive, constructive things for you. Bye now.Dave (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but that is standard view connected with his job. Ever since the former Soviet Union came to its senses and abandoned the nuclear confrontation approach (after Chernobyl) there has been no one with the capability of mounting a nuclear missle attack on the US and we are keeping it that way. For us even to talk of using missles here is unthinkable, unpermissible and would cause the speaker to be removed from politics. I really don't know what SAC does. We sure have spent a lot of money on it that could have gone for more useful things. My guess is the base gets used for other things. Those bases were built during the cold war but now there is no cold war. All those tanks the soviets built to overrun Europe are rusting away somewhere and shortly all those airplanes and missles built by the US are just going to be junk so you really are quite safe. I got to go now because I got to work tomorrow.Dave (talk) 03:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Jakezing, I have once again received reports of your recent uncivil behavior. This shall be the last time I will request you to please observe WP:CIVIL at all times towards all users. The next time I receive such reports, I will be forced to block you temporarily. Húsönd 19:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. There's no need to be rude to other users, even in the edit summary field (referring to your recent edit). The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 22:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You and User:Max Mux

You both need to shut up and go your separate ways. It's pretty clear you two can't work together, and you both have abused WP:CIVIL on numerous occasions, including personal attacks on each others' userpages, which is against Wikipedia policy. Grow up, get a life, and learn to be mature. I don't want to have to tell you again. I hate seeing people fight for petty little reasons on the Internet, and this is no exception. It's The Internet. Nothing Is Serious! --The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 19:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 19:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'::You both need to shut up and drop it. Jakezing, you're already skating on thin ice as it is - you can't afford another screw up. Oh, and technically, Max Mux is leaving you alone, but you're not leaving him alone, trolling on his userpage constantly. Point is, shake hands and go on your way...both of you.'' --The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 01:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User_talk:A Cool Editor. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 16:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. heh

Hello Jakezing. It looks good, although I believe you still have a bit to build there. :-) I don't have much experience with Wikia anyway. Regards, Húsönd 02:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'll monitor how fast you'll make this baby grow. :-) For some time I have pondered creating something at Wikia myself. But I have so many interests that I can't seem to decide which to pick. Regards, Húsönd 02:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian... what does a Bureaucracy loving europhile like you know about that?

Lol. Theres quite a big difference between the ideals of a Liberal and those of a Libertarian in the UK. The idelogies of a conservative and a Libertarian can be used as one, hence why Libertarian conservatism exists... if you care to look, which you don't seeing as your the type of person who thinks the EU is whiter than white and like a fool enjoys being taken for a ride (you a taxpayer?). Take the Free Democratic Party of Germany. It's stated poistion is Conservative liberalism. In the UK the word Liberal in terms of politics has a different meanings. And Jakezing I would say your addition to the UKIP debate is less than smart. Hence your adherence to the European Union. Wow! You sure must be smart to allow a political elite to dictate to you, for a corrupt few to do what they like, for taxpayers money to throw around and for Europe to turn into a police state. Logic, something you clearly lack. Eurosceptic Libertarian (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Personnaly, i say f*** the current america2" This has to do with what?

"which i describe as a land of hypocrites." And the European Unions politicians are not? Their the biggest crooks about. Creating a police state and ripping off European taxpayers.

"I'd love to see europe, and explain your thing of "EU as whiter then white"... Europe the continent? Very nice. Europe as in the EU, visit Brussels, it's a disgrace. Whiter than white. As in perfect, straight, not corrupt, can do nothing wrong, claim to care about people. Their not whiter than white, but the bigest slimeballs around. The EU cares only about itself.

"and since when could people who are 15 pay taxes?"

15? I'm 18. I pay taxes. Car tax, income tax and council tax, plus the normal VAT and many more.

Eurosceptic Libertarian (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Hello Jakezing. In light of your past history and the fact you've already been blocked for personal attacks, this is not acceptable. If you continue along this path, the next block will be much, much longer than the 48-hour one I handed you last week.

Oh, and by the way, admins do have the right to post here, so I am removing that note telling us not to do so. Blueboy96 18:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it's wholly appropriate, however, to post this "the next block will be much, much longer than the 48-hour one I handed you last week". Admin or otherwise it is better to stay fully impartial and not to incline towards threats. Setwisohi (talk) 12:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize

For my outburst on Link's talk page. It had seemed to me from recent edits that you enter into discussions with tangential topics and relying upon OR, and I blew up because it seemed you were saying the very topic of the discussion was irrelevant to the discussion. I shouldn't have gotten angry like that, and I apologize. However, I do wish you'd try harder to not sidetrack topics, and base your arguments more on what the sources say.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your entry on my talk page

I only give warnings if it's related to vandalism on user pages or articles, or if there's an attack or legal threat directed at a specific user. I'm not responsible for you. I'm not responsible for anyone on here but myself. Give him a warning yourself, and if he continues, report him. Since I don't know what was going on in its entirety, giving a warning at this point may be seen as taking a side, which is something I try to avoid on Wikipedia. Because racism is a touchy topic and it indeed is WP:NPA, I have given him one warning. If he violates this and continues to violate NPA, please let me know. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 17:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I must repeat myself. What are you talking about?Max Mux (talk) 20:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please anwer when someone ask you something.Max Mux (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I directed this at Jakezing. Not you. I'm done. I'm not getting involved with either one of you anymore. You two are some of the worst people I've ever met, online or offline. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 21:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to explain it. I like to work good with everybody here.Max Mux (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Threats

Don't threaten me buster. Or use childish emoticons @)).