Jump to content

User talk:JJJ999

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 150.101.115.53 (talk) at 09:53, 15 October 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Talk goes here:

Hi. You commented "I thought hoax articles were not to be speedied?". That's the case for most hoaxes where there just might be some doubt, which is why I took this to AfD rather than nominating it for speedy; but WP:CSD#G3, vandalism, includes "blatant and obvious misinformation" and I guess the closing admin. thought the evidence, about the film and the article author, strong enough for that. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't feel strongly one way or the other, but I thought I would check. I mean, I assume it's a hoax.JJJ999 (talk) 08:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ACTDU

Please stop concealing the true nature of the farrell trophy.

AGF

I've noticed some of your user talk page comments about collectonian. I'm going to recommend before you continue in this situation that you have a good long hard read of WP:AGF.--Crossmr (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

Yes, or at the very least, I did sufficient research before nominating them. Look here and you'll see I prodded or even just added cleanup tags to some articles I reviewed at the same time. Biruitorul Talk 03:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

I told you specifically not to canvass. What you are doing right now is canvassing in every sense possible, as your language and intentions are clearly not neutral. I would recommend that you rescind your message, and any of their comments in any of these AfDs or discussions will generally be considered with less weight because of your canvassing. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cell deletion

I have changed my views to 'reconsidering'. It is obvious I am too easily swayed by other's arguments! lulz - or is that bad?! You can convince me. Bsimmons666 (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the article on the Wikipedia:Deletion review page? Or are you doing it now? Bsimmons666 (talk) 02:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC) I've asked what's the deal with that.. .if you can fix it I'm obliged... I did add it to the day section,,.,JJJ999 (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can you provide me with a link to what you're referring to? I do not record the URLs of every AFD I participate in and for whatever reason the links to the most recent AFD appear to have been removed from the article. 23skidoo (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(advice: you were probably right to take it to DR, but you may be talking just a little too sharply there to really be optimally effective.) DGG (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]