Talk:Speakeasy

Food and drink Start‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

How was the term "speakeasy" created?

According to the History Channel, it comes from the manner in which patrons ordered - the bartender would tell them to be quiet and 'speak easy'. I added this to the article. Tkessler 18:47, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

Can anybody provide source information for this line of the article: "Some discreet venues called smoke-easies have popped up in states such as New York, California, and Massachusetts where smoking marijuana in bars and clubs is prohibited." I live in Boston, MA and this is news to me.

I'd always heard it came from the fact that because anyone in such an establishment was de facto breaking the law already, gangsters and whatnot could "speak easy" about business without worrying about who overheard them. Anyone know if there's any truth to that? Mule Man 18:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article misleading?

Am I right in saying that a speakeasy was often masked behind a legitimate business, especially during prohibition, in order to lower the chances of their being raided?

If so, the article makes little mention of it.

I could, of course, be entirely wrong. Ollieha 17:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think you're right about that. Chavila 20:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any references, for this then? Or shall I add it anyway? Ollieha 22:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this article seems to include a bias against Jazz, implies that Jazz music simply came from prohibition. clearly, Jazz stands on it's own. not a user —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.252.110.34 (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its more then misleading it reads like it was written by a religious zelot. Im not a drinker myself but clearly this article needs to be removed and rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.12.233.23 (talk) 23:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about removing the article. The writing could be improved by saying speakeasies made jazz flourish. The competition between each "joint" promoted the hiring of big bands. Dress styles were changing, but not because of speakeasies. It was mostly due to college students changing their appearance with fur coats and short skirts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.219.55.126 (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Should the parenthesis type citations be replaced by wiki-style citations? --SonicEarth (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corruption?

There's a lot of talk about 'corruption' in this article...it's loaded language. I think a lot of that language should be removed. Niten (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it seems biased and repetitive. Speakeasy's should not be tied exclusively with corruption. (Brodisseus (talk) 21:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I would not include people who went to speakeasies as being corrupt. Most were hard working people at legitimate jobs and they went to a speakeasy usually only on Saturday night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.219.55.126 (talk) 13:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It reads like a high school or really bad college essay. The author is trying to demonstrate that speakeasies caused corruption, failing. It is also not really relevant to 'public reception.' 67.160.86.119 (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more. By the time I got to this line: "The speakeasies corrupted the general public by making it easy to break the laws of the prohibition." I was rolling my eyes. EricTN (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This section adds no significant information to the article; it seems the author was only interested in saying "corruption" as many times as possible.

Blind Pig

Oppose merger with speakeasy. 1990's use of the term "blind pig" in Detroit referred to an establishment that illegally sold liquor after the official closing time. (An after hours club) It is not the same as a speakeasy, which is an illegal liquor selling establishment, usually during Prohibition. Pustelnik (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Massive editing needed

The entire "public reception" section needs to be removed - there is little of redeeming value in it and the tone is completely juvenile. Any objections? Robotk (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

No objections here. Madman (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least needs a POV tag. So I added one. Woodega (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the suggested removal. 208.85.2.68 (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I have copied and pasted the information from Blind pig into this article and tweaked it up some. I know it is not as good as it can be; it still needs a good bit of work. I redirectid Blind pig to Speakeasy#Blind pigs. If anyone objects, please feel free to undo my edits and let me know. Thanks. --Andrew Kelly (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]