User talk:Dekisugi
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Please leave a . |
HeyTungstencalais (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
See, it's back to being boring again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tungstencalais (talk • contribs) 11:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
OK fine, no more vandalism lol Tungstencalais (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to start a Dekisugi fanclub - would you be interested? Tungstencalais (talk) 11:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Parenting pages
Hi Dekisugi,
I just wanted to clarify - the link you removed was for a not-for-profit charity, non-religiously affiliated site, which had information which may be of help to parents bringing up children. There is a wealth of research which explores how the transition to parenthood can affect couple relationships, I can share some of this with you if you would find this interesting.
Many thanks, Fi-fi-gi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fi-fi-gi (talk • contribs) 13:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Andrew Frost
Hi. Can you let me know why, when the author of Andrew Frost capitulated to the copyvio warning by removing the copyrighted material, you tagged it as vandalism and restored the article to its state of violation?—Largo Plazo (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
CASP
What led you to believe that the edit you revert at CASP (see diff) was vandalism? It may have not had a source immediately (which looks like it has now been added), but it certainly seems to have been a good faith edit. Cheers, Emw2012 (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Magibon
AfD nomination of Magibon
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Magibon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (3rd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pedofenion (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Guitar God 2001 and Blue Cheer
I am having some difficulties with user Whistleinthewind, who created the Guitar God 2001 page, to which you had appended a speedy deletion tag which was equally speedily removed, it appears. This page relates to guitarist Randy Holden, who is also currently in a trademark dispute with Dickie Peterson over ownership of the Blue Cheer band name--a band Holden was associated with for a short time in 1969-1970. I have tried to reference this trademark dispute on two occasions now on the Blue Cheer page and had it removed twice. The first removal was by another user, for reasons of tone as well as disputed content. I have communicated via the talk page of both Whistleinthewind and the other "remover", but received no response. I suspect that both are either Randy Holden or a close associate and that for some reason this individual believes that referenced commentary that casts doubt on some of his actions should not see the light of Wikipedia day. If you and/or some of your fellow editors have a moment, I would appreciate it if you could review my "Blue Cheer" problem and suggest a course of action. What I appear to be facing is a form of suppression of facts, unless I am being overly sensitive here.
Many thanks in advance.
Dreadarthur (talk) 02:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
I note that the Blue Cheer trademark dispute is now back on the page, courtesy of your efforts and caution to Whistleinthewind. Many thanks. It very much appeared to be an attempt to suppress referenced facts; I'm very glad you were able to address this.
Dreadarthur (talk) 04:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Rollback/vandalism
Yo Dekisugi. While I agree that this edit was problematic, it most certainly was not vandalism – it was the editors first edit to the articlespace and included a reference. It's usually a bad idea to call edits vandalism unless it's blatant. Reverting an editor without an edit summary explanation is not a very friendly way to welcome an editor to the project. I realise you are trying to protect the integrity of the encyclopaedia, but a little extra consideration for noobs wouldn't go astray. Sincerely, the skomorokh 12:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Portal/Astrology Edit
Dear Dekisugi, As you have considered my edit to Astrology Portal in appropriate, I would like to ask where. Are there governments and companies advertising for Astrologers; can Astrology be considered a religion (as I consider it mine). Is it politically wrong in stating that governments aren't advertising it in there criteria for Newstart people which at the time of documentation CES which was taken over by Centrelink in Australia, that government dept's won't consider a person is looking for work if they are Astrologers, or that they generally thought astrologers were too bright and wouldn't need there assistance in finding work, is it politically wrong in giving data that state there is no job criteria or curriculum for astrologers under college, TAFE, Universities, is advertised in the western world. Or wrong to state that astrologers are looking into environment issues ref ANSTO - ref D. Pilon Smith.
I would like to re-submit my article, and I would like to know where it needs to be changed, or should I have put it on it's own page. I have confirmation of everything I wrote, I would like to know if I just didn't give enough references or phrase it correctly. Thank you, Diane5000 (talk) 07:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
I also have documentation for everything I wrote, could you please reconsider it being admitted. Diane5000 (talk) 07:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Dr Philip Dobson
I agreed with your speedy tag on Dr Philip Dobson, but I see it got rejected on the grounds that he's a magistrate. I've put it up for AfD instead, since I don't agree that's sufficient notability. Eve Hall (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Guujaaw and User:Guujaaw
Hi; just in case you were in mind to revert his edits again, please maybe find a more diplomatic thing to refer to them as than "vandalism", although I do appreciate he's deleting content and shouldn't be, I'm going to refer his article/edits to WP:Canada and WP:NorthAmNative discussion boards; thing is he is quite probably who he says he is and is something very much like a head of state and also cultural leader of the Haida people; it's a a delicate matter; better to add fact and COI templates all over the material, I think, than to simply reverse them; article issues can include "resume" as well as "coi" and "wikify" or whatever MOS-type switch for that template is. Informative notices on WP:MOS and WP:COI have been more or less put on his talkpage, apparently he doesn't care about that (native chiefs can be kind of dismissive towards what non-natives think/want). Point is if he can be brought around to Wiki standards of behaviour, he has the potential to be a valuable contributor on a LOT of articles, so calling his additions "vandalism" is not gonna help his attitude, such as it is already.Skookum1 (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Further on Blue Cheer and Trademark Dispute
I went to the page and now see that there is much editorial commentary on the dispute by an identified contributor: Randy Pratt. None of his comments are referenced and some of them appear to be slanderous. Having said this, I am wondering if there is a way for you to discuss with him "off page" how to get some of this up on the Blue Cheer page in an acceptable manner, assuming that is even possible. It is through your effort that the fact of the trademark dispute is now left on the page, unchallenged, as should be the case. The issue now is to what extent, if at all, opinions about this dispute could be included on the page.
Many thanks again for your care and concern throughout.
Dreadarthur (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I have left some comments at Whistleinthewind, hoping that he will have some cited or citable comments available. Leaving what he has put on the Blue Cheer page, without references, sets a bad precedent, in my view.
Dreadarthur (talk) 15:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
It was constructive as it was trying to spread the message that there have been comments made on the BBC about an ethnic minority and we feel that more people should know about it. How more constructive can I be than to try to stamp out racism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 6musicmessageboarder (talk • contribs) 14:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
WHO DO U THINK YOU ARE
ur such a poo head really thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by ForeignCheese1 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Montrillion Records
to whom it may concern i woud like to put in a request not to delete the montrillion records wikipedia page. i am the ceo of the company (951)334-0054-juan. the only real proof i can show for now is this myspace page(myspace.com/montrillionrecords among other things...bands on the myspace page such as good god are former artists of the label. spoonmonster (the earths transition period) all bands on montrillion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montrilllionrecords (talk • contribs) 11:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The page on cognex does not substatiate its claim to leaders in vision. In addition I posted news of a layoff documented in the boston globe and with reference to their own financial report. why was this deleted ? is wikipedia now a site to advertise and manipulate ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cogvoid (talk • contribs) 03:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
You have no idea
Do you consider that your life has any purpose? Because you got back to my "vandalism" very fast, and it makes me ponder whether or not you have one at all. Sincerely,
Blatant VandalizerRacingsnail123go (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
MCB
I apologize, I was just pretty upset. He keeps undoing my edits to the page White Party. I had separated the LGBT Circuit Party name "The White Party" from the "White Party" Article, because white parties are simply parties where guests are asked to dress in white. It was sourced, and put to a vote, but he just keeps rv-ing it. I didn't know what to do ReetnuloV (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC).
- That was before I asked you for help. Please do help me.ReetnuloV (talk) 09:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
POV / Bias and extremist tendencies by Singh6
I asked Singh6 to retract his extremist commenst against you.
I would also like to point out that article Sikh Extremism has decided to not be deleted Satanoid (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Lastfools
Hello. I would like to a entry for Lastfools who was famous for the popcorn buzz. I think it's relevant because it's part of the Internet culture now as an example of successful and spectacular viral marketing campaign. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastfools (talk • contribs) 19:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
If you're gonna delete my post, at least clean it up all the way.
Teabagger69696969 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
SORRY I DID NOT KNOW WHAT I WAS DOING AvPdude (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Behbahan
Hi Dekisugi, Addeng External link to Behbahan was not spamming, I dont khow what you mean. Again I dont need site promotion by adding external pages because I know it wont. Thanks, Hoseini —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoseiniirfa (talk • contribs) 18:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
official links
Hi, For the record, I am not spamming. Adding the links to Ant and Decs official website on their wiki pages is perfect legal.
Adam Heayberd (talk) 09:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Adam Heayberd
Grand Prix Gliding
We have funded the last two major Grand Prix Gliding events on a non-profit basis.
Peter Newport - CEO - Air Sports Ltd, New Zealand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airsportsltd (talk • contribs) 23:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Sources
After much prodding and pushing, people have finally started citing sources. Please revisit the discussion and read and evaluate the sources. Show the single-purpose accounts and novice editors how established Wikipedia editors will have a proper AFD discussion, focussed upon looking for, citing, reading, and evaluating sources. You'll have to navigate a lot of irrelevant chatter to find the citations, and the actual discussions thereof, but I've tried to make them prominent. Uncle G (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the lame insult on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Anytime. Dekisugi (talk) 09:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, you put on a speedy tag while I was AfDing it. I really should of G1ed it, So I closed the AfD... – Jerryteps 12:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I have some reliable refs that assert notability before his death. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
that was not an 'attack' as you innapproriately put it. it was meerly a question. so please answer it. who are you?
so youre not an automated cumputer device that gives out random messages? are you a real person?
how dare you insinuate such things! do spend your whole life on here? do you get paid? i should hope so.. its fascinating really..
why do you keep proposing my articles to be deleted?!Davismccullough43 (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
check4jobs
Hi,
The reason for this post is that I would like some help, before I re-post my article as I have noticed that I will be banned if I submit the article again which appears to be an advertisement.
I have read the factors in getting tagged as an advertisment post, so I had re-write the article to include angle of achievements and history of the company rather than talking about the site.
So it would be very helpful if you could tell us which parts are getting my post flagged up as being an advertisement.
As I want to submit the page again, but do not want to get banned, so I would like to clarify the above points first with you.
Thank you.
Thanks for the welcoming to wikipedia
i wanted to create a wikipedia account beacuse i fealt like it would be a different way to propose to my girlfriend
just to let you know it worked !!
anyway thanks again :)
Ben
Motograter
Any given reason why you removed the Motograter info on their return? ````
Same thing as before
Can't I add the info that they have returned or some stuff at least?
experimenta
hello,
the page experimenta had a "speedy deletion". I have now changed a bit the content. Previously i talked to another administrator, but i don't seem to find his link... ...could you please take a look at it now and let me know if it is ok like this, and if not i would appreciate some advices.
thanks, alex §§§§ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Experimenta (talk • contribs) 17:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Will Satchell
I want to know why you deleted the Will Satchell page. He is a legitatmate runner at Libertyville High School and I was not done with the revisions. So please undo the deletion of it. ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lhsxc15 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
America's Suitheart
Why do you keep changing it?XxFallOutFan13xx (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Ok I messed up thanxz for the help XxFallOutFan13xx (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Interculturalism
Not wanting to appear rude, but when you deleted the entire section of External Links because "you don't really need these," how were you able to determine that no one would really need them?
This article is a stub, and in part that's because the content treats interculturalism as just a philosophy, when in fact it's also a growing professional field with thousands of practitioners, some in academia, some working within large corporations, and others working in the nonprofit sector.
My organization (whose link you deleted) has for 33 years put on a month-long series of workshops for professionals in the field. The Intercultural Press (whose link you also deleted) has an entire catalog of titles on the topic of interculturalism. Why wouldn't people wanting to know about interculturalism want this information? How else would they get it? Isn't a web-based encyclopedia useful because it lets you link information to other information?
Joel (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
What was wrong with the piece that I wrote? The Slim Jim has been changed in recent years. I believe that is important knowledge for the page. Jeremy Jweinraub42986 (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
ah sorry, I didn't realise. I have added a construction message to the article to indicate that it will be expanded on and assurances have been given to another admin that the page will be updated over a period of time to an article suitable enough for wikipedia, thanks Foundationwestford (talk) 19:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Why do you keep deleting the ABAP section in "List of tools for static code analysis" ?
The comment "removed non-exist page" ist not really giving any meaningful information.
What's going on?
==> Understood your motivation. Can we agree that I have some time to create an article about the product before you kill my entry again?
Vfeditor (talk) 12:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Why "T-SQL Analyzer" section was deleted in "List of tools for static code analysis"?
This is not a spam but working commercial tool for T-SQL source code analysis. ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.90.195.222 (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Dekisugi, my apologies. After a day going through the references, you are right! I could find no sustainable evidence of notability. I am not going to contest the tag. You should be able to have it deleted 12-10 with no problems. Again, sorry. ShoesssS Talk 16:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
lol
lol im just messin with u guys!!!!! lolololololololololololol ROFLCOPTER!!! ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by JakoSnako (talk • contribs) 14:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
U
please can u not send me messages like these as they make me upset :(