Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Soho

Dark Soho

band fails WP:BAND, sourced to their myspace page and nothing seemingly making them notable.

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - more antipsytrance on Wikipedia. We lost Texas Faggott last week, let's not lose another important psytrance band shall we? They don't chart; psytrance doesn't chart. But find me a psytrance fan, anywhere in the world, who has not heard of these bands or seen them countless times. Now perhaps people will agree that there is an attempt, for god knows what reason, to eradicate psytrance from Wikipedia. Enough is enough. "Dark Soho" gets 136,000 ghits Tris2000 (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Myspace band.—Kww(talk) 13:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient notability per WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No 3rd party sources, no assertion of notability. Robert Skyhawk ^{So sue me! (You'll lose)} 01:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another band with lots of hits, and they're all MySpace, blogs, fansites, and discographies from online stores. Tris2000, please have a look at WP:NM. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. Quid Pro Quo²³ 07:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]