Jump to content

User talk:Cheers dude

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darrenhusted (talk | contribs) at 11:24, 19 December 2008 (→‎So we are clear...: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my user talk page. Just as a note so there's no confusion, I am also IP user 65.31.103.28 (talk).

Hello there, Cheers dude! Today's your lucky day, because you have new messages at L'Aquatique's talk page.
Creepy grinning smilie
Creepy grinning smilie
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.

In case anyone was wondering, he made the edit 4 times on 2009, 3 or 4 on 2010, and 3 on 2011. That's a total of 7 pr 8 reverts on related articles; it's not an explicit violation of WP:3RR, but it is of WP:EW. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but blocks are not punishment. Continuing the discussion on the article talk page is a much better idea. Calling a good-faith user a vandal and a troll, otoh, is not. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 23:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Actually, I ended the edit warring of that edit and I merely only added a citation needed after the info on each of the articles before they blocked me and let them know I was doing this on the talk pages as well. I first informed them that I would do that too as I thought it was a compromise but then he went ahead and reverted that as well. Anyways, thank you for understanding Guido and I shall take your advice. Cheers! :) Cheers dude (talk) 23:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the edit is really is this controversial, I will just drop it. I thought I was making a harmless constructive edit with 'is expected to be' but since the edit is 'crazy' and 'silly' and I'm known as a 'vandal' because of it; Gee whiz! Honestly, I'm just touched right now more than anything because of your support on the administrative noticeboards. Thank you so much and sorry for any inconvenience Guido! :) [1] Cheers dude (talk) 23:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. The edit certainly doesn't look crazy or silly to me, but perhaps it can be reworded to make everybody happy. Regards, Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 23:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the block is longer than I thought. I am blocked until the end of the day; not an hour. I plan on making one more edit of giving you a barnstar as soon as I get unblocked and then taking a break from editing because my feelings are hurt by how these people are treating me. Ok cya! Cheers dude (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Real World/Road Rules Challenge

Thanks for helping watch/edit the Real World/Road Rules Challenge pages. I have proposed some changes on the discussion page on which I would be happy to have your input. Thanks again! Plastikspork (talk) 23:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So we are clear...

Removing the warning does not mean that you can make the third revert, if I were you I would stay away from the Cody Rhodes page for 24 hours. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]