Jump to content

Talk:The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.151.173.242 (talk) at 00:49, 24 December 2008 (→‎Need for references and sources ?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconBooks Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Need for references and sources ?

The note stating that "This article does not cite any references or sources" needs to be removed. The article merely lists the data (ISBN, publisher, etc) of the book's editions and contains the briefest description of its content. What other "references" and "sources" could be needed? The Gnome 23:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I think publishing details are probably sufficient as references for an article about a book. I have removed the template. Terraxos 20:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about a criticism section? 75.3.227.236 (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


so it seems that nazis were not as bad as they presented...much worse are black racists and jewish

banned?

why would anyone want to ban this book?Ethmegdav (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]