Jump to content

User talk:Nichalp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.180.5.41 (talk) at 21:49, 6 January 2009 (→‎Hi Nichalp!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

About this page...

Archives
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67

  • Please do not reply to topics more than 3 days old. I may miss it. If you wish to revive an old topic of discussion, copy the entire text of that topic (including any WikiSyntax) and put it at the bottom by following the edit link above.
  • I will usually reply on your talk page

Mumbai Forts

I now have a copy of Scholberg (1995), Fortress Portugal In India: A photographic history of the Portuguese Forts of India. The Bombay Forts section (to use the old name) covers 11 forts and consists of four pages of text and two pages of photographs. Many of these forts are described by a single paragraph. Bacaim has more than a page; and Chaul and Morro de Chaul have 3/4 and 1/2 a page, respectively of text. On this basis, for most of these forts, I don't think you will have enough source material to make GA status. I've also borrowed a couple of volumes of the New Cambridge History of India. I will help expand some of the articles using Scholberg when I have time. Pyrotec (talk) 11:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2009

Happy New Year Nichalp!!!! I wish for you and your family to have a wonderful 2009!!! Have fun partying and may you make many edits!!!

-RavichandarMy coffee shop 11:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wish you and you family a Happy and Prosperous New year--Suyogtalk to me! 12:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I wish you a very happy and prosperous new year, despite the fact that with each year you are getting older and closer to death, Muhahaha...! (just playin..., its not like I'm escaping the same fate... :) Shiva (Visnu) 20:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Happy new Year 2009, Nichalp. History of Mumbai has been successfully promoted to GA status. KensplanetTC 10:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Ring out the old,
and Ring in the new.
Happy New Year!

From FloNight

Keep up the great work!

The Photographer's Barnstar
I hereby award you this barnstar for all your efforts (despite a damaged pen-drive) in uploading these images of the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Keep 'em coming!

Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to put up images in the geography section in the India article because almost every wiki country has an image in geography section except India. I feel strongly that India should show its natural beauty to the world. It will also make the India page look better. I feel strongly that more images is needed to make the article colorful and exciting. Also Ashoka Chakra should be included in the government section because it will provide a symbol of unified India in the past and present. (Dewan S. Ahsan 12:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC))

Hello Nichalp. If you wish to improve the article. Just do it. This is our own Bombay article. Lots and lots of space for Images. Just add it. Thanks, KensplanetTC 14:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Take your break. Enjoy !!! KensplanetTC 17:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Nichalp, List of districts of West Bengal has got promoted to FL. Thanks for your comments/suggestions in peer review/FLC review.--GDibyendu (talk) 16:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Origins of Bombay

Thanks. I searched the book online and got to know that page 349, here, contains population figures for years 1872, 1881 and 1891. But earlier figures are on page 348 which is not available in "Limited Preview". Sad. I was also able to get figures from 1901 onwards. If you could let me know the figures from year 1661 on page 348, it will complete the series. Thanks ! --GPPande 19:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great help! I would shortly start working on this. BTW, what do you think of Kalimpong FAR? Almost 30+ reliable sources have been added to the article since the review begin. --GPPande 08:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder about outstanding issues at Talk:Gate of Mercy Synagogue/GA1. Cirt (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see, I am sorry about that. Give me a ping on my talk page in the future if you reconsider doing further research on it. Cirt (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using top Indian Wikipedian list

Hi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on User:Tinucherian/Indians WP to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks. Vjdchauhan (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Nichalp!

Since you are a senior Wikipedia ediotr, I just wanted to highlight the recent edits made by User:Lalit Jagannath. Some of his edits raise suspicion about his true motive here. Thanks --67.180.5.41 (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]