User talk:Gwernol

Template:Nothere

Hello. Welcome to my Talk page. Feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of the page. Please sign your comments by putting ~~~~ at the end. Thanks, Gwernol.

Happy First Day of Spring!

Template:Saleisha Hello Gwernol,

Can you please replace Saliesha's picture with a more appropriate one. Or at the very best just remove the old one. Keep it clean.

Thank You

a saber type

Well technically it's not an actual "fan-film", considering that it's going to be a quite huge production, costing a great deal of money. It's an independent film, based off of descriptions of events that I found on this site, that also had no references. The weapon itself is loosely based off of a weapon that was briefly mentioned in a book that I read a long while back, which was only mentioned once as "A lightsaber, with a hilt of extraordinary length, and a short blade." Other than calling it, "The Mincris", there was no other mention of it after that. I just gave it a name since it's used in my film. But the part about the blue prints being found in a Sith tomb, along with a holocron was actually from that book.

But thank you for sending me what I had written.

[EDIT] Ah, I found some reference from official lucas arts published work that I can actually remember the name for.. Darth Nihl used a variation of this weapon. It was referred to as a "Lightsaber Cane", which I guess is why I forgot about him. The name "The Mincris" is what was on the holocron in the other book that I had read.

So... Yeah, Here's my visual proof of the weapon. http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/6/68/Nihlprofile.jpg

...

What's this all about?

I just got sent two messages regarding vandalism for something I didn't write. You accused me of adding my birthday to the wiki entry for the date of Jan. 13. Seeing as how my birthday doesn't fall on that day, I suggest you and yours stop accusing me of something I clearly wasn't responsible for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.68.250.213 (talk • contribs)

Retr0

If a posting on the world wide web, by whatever means, can be considered for libel it must therefore be considered as 'published'. I am not into the minutiae of wikipedia but denying work published on the www, anywhere, is the wiki ideal being corrupted. Any knowledge once published, anywhere must be considered as new knowledge and consequently fit for inclusion in any encyclopedia, otherwise what is the point?

I accept the point about publishing 'original work' but not work on a web site whose contents are available to the world.

OK, I accept the knuckle rap for vandalism, just trying it on.

Made my rant on the [verifiability] page.

Hope you had a chance to check out the narrow gauge movies on my web page. Abbey Light Railway

Now off for two weeks in sunny Spain.

Why

I want to know why you keep sending me messages about me vandalizing Wikipedia. Ok, so I DID do something wrong on ###### but I wasn't lying about the Prostitution in Los Angeles, California since I used to live there I would know about that stuff. So please, please do not get me for stuff that you don't have facts about. Personally, I think you're TRYING to get me banned. Please don't do it unless you have good reason. I DID NOT THREATEN YOU!!!! You threatened me. I'm using freedom of speech and you can't ban me for that. Do what you like but I can get you banned just as well for threatening but I didn't threaten you, do some background research and TRY AND FIND WHERE I THREATENED YOU!! You won't find it! -Poison12346

VERY IMPRESSED

i LIKE YOU. bUT REALLY, WHAT THE PROB. iT IS NOT A CATERGORY? Master Redyva (talk)

Hey. User:64.183.19.6 vandalised Iron Maiden. Do you want to drop him a note? I undid the edit. Master Redyva (talk)

edits on CA service desk page

Greetings Gwernol,

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am writing you regarding the Wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CA_Unicenter_Service_Desk.

I have been the user adding the external link titled 4utechnologies.com. We also run the world’s largest free forum of Unicenter Service Desk users. Users can go there and find solutions free of charge.

While 4uTechnologies is a consulting company, we are partnered on many different levels with CA, inc. Of course CA, Inc. is aware that 4uTechnologies has partnered with them for many years. We have a strategic partnership with education, services and we are a distributor for this software called Unicenter Service Desk.

I understand there has been a report about us (4uTech), yet this is not from CA, Inc. it is from a past employee “gityerfix”. This employee has sought to remove all our important information on Wikipedia.

If CA, INC. would request us to remove our external link, we of course, as their partner would be more than happy to do so. I feel 4uTechnologies; Inc. has been a part of Unicenter Service Desk history.

Thank you in advance for your attention and understanding on this matter.

eric@4uTechnologies.com CEO / President SJF /EJZ

Alejandro Jadad

I am trying to improve the definition of health and the corresponding Wikipedia entry. However, a bot and more recently you, have incorrectly reverted my changes, regarding them as vandalism. Please let me know if I am doing something inappropriate. The definition of health has not been changed since 1948 (there was an incorrect statement in the entry I found) and we will be celebrating its ratification by the United Nations on June 24. I believe that Wikipedia could play a key role in motivating the world community to think about how to define such an important aspect of our lives, and to do it as a global collective effort.

If you want to discuss this further, please contact me at ajadad@ehealthinnovation. org

Lordlactose: Inquiry

When I placed the link of my you tube eugenic video under the article about eugenics you deleted it. How come this link is allowed to be there. http://www.prometheism.net/ -- Lordlactose (talk) 14:42, June 24, 2008 (UTC)

domestic sheep

One link doesn't work, I'm trying to get them in alpa order, add a link to merino and and to the merino stud association, I know I hav mead e lot of mistakes but could you pleas let me finish.

Could you read the content of http://www.aasrp.org/ please, I get a backorder this domain, in other words they have let their domain laps. Is ^{[dead link]} still the right thing to do? Actually it's a pretty bad page, when you close your browser it brings up a lot of rubbish. I will leave it for you to sort out I'm going t bed.

The --> was because I forgot how to put in a comment.

Thank you

File:Thankyouattacks.jpg

Switzerland (2007 - 2009) - U.S. intelligence targeting/attack of U.S. Citizen Abroad for compulsory servitude espionage participation. Non-compliance threatened with U.S. Federal prison; Compliance indicated foreign imprisonment (civilians do not share U.S. intelligence diplomatic immunities). U.S. intelligence objective: infiltration of foreign national statistics offices; Desired Output: foreign government-collected corporate insider trading stock-market information, and supply-chain data (of potential usage for WTO Dispute Settlement determination of material damage per WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures). Total project cost: Over eight million U.S. dollars. Project objectives (data) were never viable. Two-year attack project involved inter alia military materiél, deceptive contracts and undercover operations. Protect America Act of 2007 immunized myriad official felonies via "Liability Protection" of the Act (Section 105B(l). U.S. Citizen forced to ultimately file for political asylum after extraordinary protections appeals to U.S. Congress failed; Possible grounds for failure: CIA Officer (aggressor) was former Trade Counsel to the United States Senate Committee on Finance, former Minority (Democratic) Senate Trade Counsel. CIA Officer evidently deceptively marketed project to Members of Congress as "national security"-crucial. U.S. Citizen forced to request protection of U.S. Trade partners in lieu of normal Constitutional or extraordinary Congressional protections (refused). The CIA was deployed into U.S. trade affairs in 1993 per Presidential Directive 35, this being part of the post Cold-War intelligence reorientation. Myriad expert opinions (including former senior CIA officer Allan E. Goodman) expressing concerns that such areas are NOT CIA forte1 2 have been resolutely ignored by the Bush and Clinton Presidential administrations alike. Noted: this CIA-driven project attacked a Citizen forwarding U.S. free trade interests. Expert opinions opposing espionage deployment in trade diplomacy make note of high-risk to trade-partner relations; also noting inappropriateness of such zero sum espionage tactics in Pareto efficiency-related trade negotiation work. Lack of U.S. legal protections and refusal of Congress to provide extraordinary protections evident; U.S. Citizen filed for political asylum from U.S. Government aggression in early January 2009. Initial attacks commenced on popular online encyclopedia. 83.76.14.42 (talk) 18:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Refugeestatus2009 (talk • contribs) [reply]

Searl Effect Generator, again...

Hello Gwernol,

there is another dispute about the Searl_Effect_Generator article again. This time it is about the link to a citation on narod.ru that i provided. Alxc thinks that this link and paragraph in the article has to be deleted, because "The source of the pages on the referenced website is unverifiable. It is a free hosting site in Russia. Any crazy can host there." I reverted that edit twice by now, and currently my revert is still the actual article. However, this brought up a small, sensible exchange with LeContexte in so far that references to translations of small parts of something written in an foreign language might not be sufficient. This, of course, brings up the problem that i see lots of references to english stuff on the german WP, for example. Also, links to YouTube videos should be deleted on sight, well, because "It is a free hosting site in Russia. Any crazy can host there." to use his words.

Maybe you want to participate into the discussion on the article's talk page, right at the very bottom.

In fact, following the "reliability of sources" argument, the whole article better is deleted completely, together with the article about Searl himself, because the SEG is the only thing that makes him somewhat notably.

Archives