User talk:Skier Dude

This is Skier Dude's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Skier_Dude.

Danity Kane discography protection request

Hello, Skier Dude. I was coming to ask you if you would semi-protect the Danity Kane discography article when I saw that you have already protected the Danity Kane article just today. I ask that you also protect its Danity Kane discography article. The reason I ask is due to constant changing of sourced information there by IPs. Maybe if they see that they cannot edits that article, a few of them will stop changing it to unsourced material after its protection wears off. Flyer22 (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot. Flyer22 (talk) 04:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Bazerman

Hi, quick question: why did you delete the image from the ibox? Your edit summary on 1/24 said "deleted image removed", but the image has been on Commons since 1/16 and has never been deleted. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK cool thanks for the reply. – ukexpat (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

image deletion from H. Paul Shuch

What is your reason for recommending this image for deletion? The image is of me, I uploaded it, and there are no copyright issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drseti (talk • contribs) 19:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino copyvios

Hi Skier. Can you place the following vios up for deletion. See the people. A user has uploaded clear local government photos and is wrongly claiming GNU that he created them all. They are all clear copyvios and the editor is degrading the articles with his long lists with them in. The vios are being used on Valenzuela City and some of the lists of local officials. Thanks Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following are vios:

Indeed of all the cheek! Yes I removed the ugly long list (obviously constructively from the main article and put it in his list). Who wants to see a fat bloated table full of poor quality obviously copyrighted images will little info? Perhaps a few paragraphs of text summarising the main leaders only. I must say that "all" of the Filipino guys I've come across on wikipedia to date are quickly gaining a reputation for cockiness and arrogance on here. I;m sure there are many who aren't, but does seem strange the ones I've encountered so far... Hope you are well Skier! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The images of Pio valenzuela however should definately be public domain by now as it is over 100 years old. Howver I have a higher quality image I'll upload to the commons so the two he uploaded here can be deleted.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flooding

Please stop disrupting my talk page. You do not need to repost all that text over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. As you can see, it becomes annoying. :) -- Cat ^chi? 21:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Information before delation of images

For your information I am the author of these paintings (both 06 Bozji plodovi 70x50 akrilik copy.jpg and 06 Ljudi na izlozbi.jpg), and I consider myself an artist. So I would like your help to keep these images in wikipedia since I think I will be needing them in the future, as well as for some future references about my artwork. What should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof saxx (talk • contribs) 08:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danity Kane

Towards the end about Aubrey's sexuality and the Playboy spread, that wasn't in the interview, which means what's showing up here is false facts. True, Dawn did said that she's still surprise--but she wasn't talking about Aubrey's business. Why are you trying to mess up the girls careers with false info?

-Jayy4life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayy4life (talk • contribs) 21:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter

The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:73421 CAL B727-200.jpg

Possibly unfree File:73421 CAL B727-200.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:73421 CAL B727-200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

SKIER DUDE, FYI, THIS (AND ALL OF JON PROCTOR'S AVIATION PHOTO WORKPRODUCT)ARE PERMITTED FOR INCLUSION ON WIKIPEDIA PER HIS 11 JAN 2009 EMAIL TO ME GRANTING SAME. PLEASE REMOVE ANY BLOCKS, AND REVERT THE IMAGE. (I AM NOT ENTIRELY CERTAIN WHICH *PERMISSION* I SHOULD HAVE USED; BUT PROCTOR'S GRANT OF AUTHORITY IS AUTHENTIC).