Talk:Peak Rail

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Trains: in UK Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Peak Rail.

Signalling diagram errors

Although I have no personal knowledge of this railway, there seems to be a number of obvious inaccuracies on the signalling diagram included in the article:

The semaphore arms of signal CL6 are projecting on the wrong side of the post
The L.O.S. is facing the wrong way
Signal CL14 is bracketed away from line instead of towards it
Signal DD7 is bracketed away from line instead of towards it

Could someone with reliable knowledge of the signalling on this railway please confirm the correct situation. –Signalhead ^< T > 14:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating a new track diagram, smae size as the old one, but problems fixed. manadude2 (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; that's corrected some of the errors but CL6 and DD7 are still wrong, I reckon. –Signalhead ^< T > 22:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After spending about 5 months at the railway, and worked in both signalboxes, I can assure you the signals on this diagram are as accurate as possible to the real thing, but due to space and some problems encountered during production, the diagram may not be 100% accurate, which is something you can expect. If you want to have a bash at creating a diagram that IS 100% accurate, be my guest, but it is impossible to be completely accurate. Please be aware that there is no offencive thoughts in this message. manadude2 (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've created my own version of the diagram and included it in the article. –Signalhead ^< T > 22:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Grammar

Please use correct grammar. I have noticed commas with no spaces, and name uncapitalised. I have added the {{copyedit}} tag. Thanks manadude2 (talk) 21:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would reccomend that the 'future' and 'extensions' sections be merged, and second the grammatical condemnation of the entirety.