Talk:Jacqueline Saburido

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

jaqui

maybe a picture should be put on to this article. because it is about her face. and if people dont who dont how she looked before and after ,its realy no point--[[User:Matri 16:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I would not recommend to do something like that, her after images are extremely distubing for the regular viewers, specially the material that is used by the Texas Department of Transportation.

But maybe just a pre photo......... --Matrix17 15:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No do not put a picture of her on this site. My school showed me her picture and I'm traumatized. Put a link and a warning besides it that says graphic images and viewer discretion advised.

"Boo hoo! I'm traumatized!" That's the whole point -- so next time you feel like rolling soused into the drivers seat or putting the foot down, you think how your actions might cause horrific injuries to some other poor person. Or yourself. But anyway, IMHO we shouldn't put a picture of Jacqui in this article without her permission at least... out of respect for one thing, but also because the pics from helpjacqui.com and the Texas government are probably copyright. --Jquarry 22:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright - You can use this images but I think it's not good idea. That's not good for example for children

Shut up. Every original image, photo or video is copyrighted by someone. If Wiki has Jacqueline's permission to put a current photo in this article, do it. It will raise more awareness to the drink-and-drive problem. She even posed by her own will for a campaign. I'm sure there are already many idiots out there humiliating her and using her photo(s) for "satire". There is an older man in my city with a completely burned and disfigured face, I see him regularly on the streets. Any child can see his face and point their fingers at him, any teenager can laugh at him. Yet he's brave enough not to stay at home because of his fate. 83.78.5.83 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No way in hell without an external link with a warning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.252.68 (talk) 04:04, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

ok, first off wikipedia is not censored, so a picture of her wouldnt be a bad idea. i think there should be a warning at the top though, because some people may not want to see it —Preceding unsigned comment added by AustinGOLDENEYE (talk • contribs) 22:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I'm sure a picture of her would probably be considered a shock image. I saw a picture of her on a myspace bulletin and couldn't sleep the whole night. Gdfanatic21594 01:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This conversation is ridiculous. It's her FACE. There's nothing she can do about it. There's nothing you can do about it. But saying she's a monster and should be hidden from view is morally reprehensible. Her portrait is not a shock photograph, nor does it need a warning. Biographies on Wikipedia are usually accompanied by the person's photograph. To say she's so ugly it's "bad for the children" is vile and wretched to the core. You should all be ashamed.<GeneralKlagg>

A photo of Saburido would be appropriate for her biography. Some of the discussion above is correct in that Wikipedia is not censored. I am surprised that we don't have a good representation of this Texas state-wide public story. In fact, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has her photo displayed here, and from what I understand, this is per her wish - Quote: Without hesitation, she agreed to a Texas Department of Transportation anti-DWI campaign. She's also posed for posters... [1]. She is a wonderful person for wanting to share her life changing event with others. I see no problem with adding her photo, which at least several should be available, and in public domain from the State of Texas. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you taken a freaking look at the gangrene article; it's friggin disturbing to put it mildly. I have tried to put a warning on top of the article, All the got me was an annoying wikinerd 101 don't vandalize message and a 24 h ban. GOOD LUCK 82.53.168.174 (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

After investigating the matter, it appears that the subject is, in fact, notable per WP:N. Bearian (talk) 21:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]