User talk:QUADCIN
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hi QUADCIN! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
And thanks for the addition you made over at Leland castle. Your use of verifiable sources is to be commended! ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Rochelle Park material and sources
I note your expansion to the Rochelle Park article, as in this version before your development was deleted by User:Orlady, who is focussed upon "sockpuppets" of User:Jvolkblum. I assume your account will be labelled as a Jvolkblum sock and soon will be blocked. I believe that Orlady and others are technically correct that it is legal under wikipedia policies and practices for them to delete everything you add, because of past stuff, whether or not your material is useful. Anyhow, it looks to me like the topic does deserve an article, and it could be interesting. I would like to support your ability to edit this and other articles in the wikipedia. However, for your contributions to be protected, rather than stripped out immediately by editors focussed on enforcement, it would be necessary for you to go through an unban process. If you are interested, contact me by email through my User page. doncram (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I dont see how I would go about being unbanned when I was never banned in the first place. I have experienced being accused and blocked for being an extension of someone else who is banned. None of such charges are true so I therefore do not see how I can be legitimately blocked in the first place. I made multiple articles yesterday about the citys neighborhoods and then my user account was blocked. I created a new one which I am editing from currently and its because I should certainly not have been blcoked seeing that I have never been banned before. I am confused why I am blamed for any of this.