User talk:Legolas2186

	Archive
	1 · 2

Hi all. This is Legolas. Welcome to my talk page. --"Legolas" (talk) 10:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a message for me. Assume good faith

Septimus Heap

No problem with waiting a few days. Personally, i would simply cut and paste the list sections into new articles to work on instead of user-space, then other editors can bring them up to standard. This depends on being able to show notability of the characters (either individually or as a whole), but as many of the major character already have their own articles i think this should already be covered. Is there a particular reason you don't like that method here?Yobmod (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Americanpiemusicvideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Americanpiemusicvideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Hankypankymusicvideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hankypankymusicvideo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Fame Article

I am not removing any information from this article. I am adding information that is true with refferences to prove my point. You are the one who is removing information from the article as you are deleting factual information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youstinklmao (talk • contribs) 05:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left him another note. --Efe (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to comment on your edit here. You are fully aware Legolas that you are engaged in an edit war over small stuffs. The edit summary "revert" does not help at all. I see why your edit was reverted, again. I suggest, after all your effort to clean up pages, to give substantial edit summaries despite their eccentric behaviors nowadays. --Efe (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have left a hidden comment on GaGa's page. It seems this what keeps the edit war going on. I hope we can settle this. --Efe (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. The only problem I see with Dance is that he always add contents when he knows its disputed and a consensus has yet to be reached. If someone tries to ignore the note, I'll either use my administrative tools (although I am sort of afraid because I am highly involved in this) or report to wherever appropriate. --Efe (talk) 09:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I understand your sentiments. I am just trying to "salvage" him from the abyss of his own "uberness". Anyway, I have started with that "LoveGame" thing and he seemed listening to me. He stop adding them. Second, I have given a link at GaGa's talk page regarding how to determine an associated act. So far, that's what I have accomplished. Its past 5 here. I have class. "See" you later... and enjoy your tea. --Efe (talk) 09:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

W******. --Efe (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GaGa

Ok you have repeditly said that this source is bad--http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/02/lady-gaga-inter.html , please give reason why it is. I will tell you why it is reliable it is a entertainment weekly article(journalistic aproach) therefore reliable. Dance-pop (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what I hear blah blah blah. You posts do not matter to me because you are a bad user on wiki.Dance-pop (talk) 04:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your giving me a haedache, I have to clean up your mess. You say assume good faith, that is very hyortical becuase you dont. Dance-pop (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. I cannot help you about this matter... as of 12 pm. I have to eat my lunch. Hehe. I'll get into this matter, maybe later later. --Efe (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this discussion from Efe's talk page. I have to weigh in here and say that the above source is reliable. Independent blogs are not reliable (per Wikipedia), but blogs from reliable sources reporting news, especially interviews, are reliable (per Wikipedia). Flyer22 (talk) 06:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes, even reliable sources get things wrongs, however. If there are other reliable sources which go against what one reliable source is reporting, then it is best to use the other reliable sources instead. Or combine them, relaying what each has reported. Flyer22 (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up what this is all about, Legolas2186. I was too lazy to go through and read/look at the revision history before weighing in on this (obviously). Flyer22 (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To all involved, I've brought this up at WP:ANI#Disruption at Lady GaGa. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna discog

Try alternatives like adding a hidden comment on the page or dropping notifications to IPs. Not much activity or yesterday to warrant a protection. --Efe (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. You're a... a... tireless reverter. Hehe. Well, we don't use the tool for preemptive measures. If the page is being attacked by vandalism, drop me a message. If only bad charts, I am afraid. But still drop me a message. I'll help you educate them about the guidelines of WP. --Efe (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh Eh Capital/Lower Letters

There is no rules as to whether small or capital are used for second genres on wikipedia. Genres are the names of something. They are important, therefore the genre should begin with a capital besides it looks much better and less sloppy witht he use of capitals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youstinklmao (talk • contribs) 05:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Control Freak

Legolas, quit changing the Upper case letter to a lowercase. No wonder why so many other wikipedians hate you. Your a wikipedia control freak. You think you know everything. It's always your way or no way. Let someone else share what they know for once. I am the one that put Europop in the genre section, If it wasn't for me putting it there, then no one else would of yet you go along and constantly change it! Leave it for once. You can't handle having anyones but your own information on certain wiki articles. You don't own wikipedia, your no boss, your no better than anyone else on hear so quit acting like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youstinklmao (talk • contribs) 05:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Youstinklmao. Please be civil when you drop comments on anybody's talk page. Legolas is right. ~~As for the case of "Eh, Eh", Europop has to start with lowercase because there is another genre before it. You only capitalize the first entry, the rest are not.~~ --Efe (talk) 05:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your not a police officer, (as far as I know on wikipedia anyway) you have no authority over anyone. You can't warn me for anything! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youstinklmao (talk • contribs) 05:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I have crashed out the latter part of my comment. In the article Europop, the word starts with the uppercase throughout. Perhaps you discuss it in the talk page. --Efe (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the article Europop, the word starts with a capital all throughout the page. Consider having a good read! It's best that you stick to editing articles about The Lord Of The Rings.

--Youstinklmao (talk) 05:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I somewhat agree with you Legalos--This guy/gal is worst then me swaering on wikipedia--calm down Youstinklmao(werid name-no ffence).Oh and about that comment-Second dance-pop real funny(sarcasm--i dont think you know it because i have tried it before), perphaps a second Legalos for all ways saying bad source. Now thats funny..Dance-pop (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commented here: Talk:Eh,_Eh_(Nothing_Else_I_Can_Say)#Genre. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever

You delete all the information that I put on Wikipedia. I even have refferences. It's like your the only one who wants their info on wikipedia. I'm trying to make good articles, your making it difficult. Your a control freak! Someone has to stand up to people like you!

--Youstinklmao (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate cover-The Fame

I think the alternate album has a place on the article. There has to be a reason for it. One blue, one red Lady GaGa. I think it complies with NFCC#8. It has importance>will make people think and if you check other artsits albums you will see alternate> with less signigance.Dance-pop (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful, Dirty, Rich

Can you please speak to an administrator about User:Dance-pop and his or her reopening the closed article for "Beautiful, Dirty, Rich". The user continues to reopen it after a discussion months ago. He or she threatens to have me blocked. Charmed36 (talk) 03:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Listenmusicvideo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Listenmusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion and redirection of GaGa BDR

What are you doing. This disscussion is not over. Please wait several more days, for others to give and voice there view.A consenus has not yet finished and/or even begun, create a vote page or wait till the end and closure of the disscussion.Please follow wikis deltion policy as well by putting an overview of the disscussion. "This is madness!" and you say...Dance-pop (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Offical Release is here go to the SOURCE-http://www.ladygaga.com/discography/. Promo single therefore bypasses third notability. Based on downloads only--makes it more signifcant> notable. Millions of people would have seen the promo for the tv seris>huge promotion for artist. Here is a SOURCE for chart ranking it went to 89 in the UK based on DOWNLOADS- http://www.theofficialcharts.com/top40_singles.php. Third party sources-http://www.last.fm/music/Lady+GaGa/Beautiful%2C+Dirty%2C+Rich and http://music.vodafone.co.nz/ft/track/lady_gaga/beautiful__dirty__rich/15190668/. Therfore it compies with WP:NSONGS. Thanks, I am trying to develop the article so it can come to a better standard. I DONT want it deleted even though it is under development.Dance-pop (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dont make this personal Legalos, because there are consequence, believe me consequence. The pic you put on was UGLY. Dont worry I has been reviewed by another editor and they found a licence. Its from flickr. Becarful. "Maddness.....This is sparta, and I kick you in the death hole.Dance-pop (talk) 04:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You certinly making it a personal attack. I should contact the ANI for you and you too are not following 3RR rule. It is your opinion that I am being 'abusive' and 'threatning'. I have to clean up your mess, when you see a change on a page, go to the history, I put edit sums., but you dont seem to listen to them. I dont want to break the 3RR rules, but you are ignoring my comments, I have spoken to two admins before about the ignoring yet they ignored me. Please stop your "controversial" edits and reverts.Dance-pop (talk) 05:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Admins shouldnt open the ANI for any reason, or when someone disagrees. This is about content dispute. We are creating an edit war, we shouldnt, that is why in my edit sums. say disscuss at the edit page, so edit wars arent ongoing and we get in trouble. I am holding in my fruestraion and anger in, because I will get blocked, even though I shouldnt. Please stop you threating edits. Thanks. KInd Regards. :) Dance-pop (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dance-pop

Having taken a quick look, I would say for the record that your redirection of Beautiful, Dirty, Rich (Lady GaGa song) while the AfD was still ongoing was inappropriate - you should wait for a consensus to form before taking such an action, and right now there is no consensus at all on that article. However, Dance-pop is continuing to edit war over a misinterpretation of sources from what I can see. I just commented at Talk:Lady GaGa, and will leave a note on Dance-pop's talk page in just a moment. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is kept, I'd recommend you go along with the consensus. If there's no consensus to support a redirect or merge, talk it over on the talk page of the article before you do so. And as you pointed out, if the article is improved there may be no need to take any action.

Anyway, I've left a long explanation of things and a firm warning on Dance-pop's talk page. I'll probably be hearing from him soon, so hopefully we can work things out then. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disscussion Future pop

Anyways however reliable a source maybe, the genre future-pop needs to be established by a third party, untill then we cannot add it to the article. They will burn it at the GA then. "Legolas" (talk) 12:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

So we cant use primary sources. What about ref 5 on lady gaga which is primary source.Should all information about that be taken off.Dance-pop (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi regarding these comments should the sources from lady gagas site be deleted too with info. I think it should if mines were deleted, if not mine should go on the article, not in the info. box., by the way she is the only one who will ever say my genre is future pop(because she is descriiong her music, so must go on the article, unless there is a third paty who says she describes it as that). Should it be changed.Dance-pop (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]