Jump to content

Talk:Munroe effect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 212.116.129.254 (talk) at 19:03, 22 February 2009 (Effectiveness: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhysics Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconExplosives NA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Removed the reference about first use, as shaped charges were used earlier by germans during Fall Gelb. I can't say if bunker buster H-Ladung devices were first military utilities of munroe effect though.

Clarification necessary

The article should state clearly, that modern warheads based on the Munroe effect utilize a metal lining of the void, therefore increasing the penetration performance (resulting in a metal stream penetrating instead of "plasma"). This arises another question, is it realy plasma (I doubt that), or just the reaction products of the chemical explosion, i.e. hot and fast moving gas molecules? Furthermore it may be a nice information to add, since when the metal lining was applied. Maybe during WW2, but the effect was discovered way early. 84.166.205.235 14:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say you doubt it really is plasma, yet you essentially go on to say it is (plasma essentially being ionized gas). The "metal stream" projected results in a copper (or steel, depending on the liner used...sometimes they even use glass) plasma.

Effectiveness

In the article it says the charge will penetrate 150-250% of the munition's diameter. This is not universal, some shaped charges (notably the linear varieties) will only penetrate 50-80% of the container width if dealing with steel that is thicker than the width of the container.

Effectiveness

In the article it says the charge will penetrate 150-250% of the munition's diameter. This is not universal, some shaped charges (notably the linear varieties) will only penetrate 50-80% of the container width if dealing with steel that is thicker than the width of the container.