Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 24

< February 23	February 25 >

February 24

File:Tulsa Depot.jpg

Does not appear to be self-made, no evidence it was self-made, no source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 00:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chap831.jpg

No evidence to support the GFDL tag. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 00:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete uploader first uploaded image with attribution to web site but no copyright status; it was deleted. This reupload is according to uploader "Fair Use: Permission granted". Uploader was asked for clarification more than a year ago without response. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imanol ordorika 4.jpg

Unused image, no source listed. Who the picture is of is not clear either. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 00:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2step pattern2.ogg

Probably self-made, but with no source info, and the uploader not active, there is no way to tell. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyan1.png

Probably self-made, but no source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tvc 64plus.jpg

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tulsa Arena.jpg

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the animal's popularity and frequent public appearances (while alive), there are likely free images to be found and freely used, rather than making a fair-use claim on a photo taken from a newspaper website. I've attempted to tag as disputed fair use, but uploader removes, but his logic is faulty (IMO). I'll let a broader discussion ensue here ZimZalaBim ^talk 06:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Constant use of non-free images when they aren't needed is why photos are rarely released for free use. What are we learning by using this replaceable non-free picture? That he looked like a chimp? Do you think that readers will say, "Oh wait, I think I know that chimp!" It's a bit silly. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem-pass.JPG

No source for photo given. Also I'm not sure about copyright status of passport images from India. Anyone know about that? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marion 1017.JPG

No source given. Also, I'm pretty sure that this would count as derivative. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As this is a plaque from the South Carolina state house, I would imagine that the plaque itself is probably out of copyright. I can't find anything that conclusively states when it was created, though. The sourcing issue is still a problem. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magenta1.png

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Psychophysical.png

No source listed. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scenter7.jpg

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCenter1.jpg

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seniorlib.gif

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 07:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor Who - classic series DVDs.jpg

Seems to be a derivative work; photo of several spines of Doctor Who DVD releases. Not sure the uploader can claim to hold the rights to this image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably be {{Non-free video cover}} at a lower resolution. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iwuchamps.jpg

This user has uploaded a dozen copyrighted images which were improperly claimed PD-self. This image is web resolution, strikingly similar to [1] and has a different timestamp then the non-webresolution images this user has uploaded. Andrew c ^[talk] 19:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I uploaded this one wrong - my bad. Manutdglory (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biolaquad.jpg

User has uploaded a dozen copyrighted image improperly claimed as PD-self. This is a really low resolution, web image. Andrew c ^[talk] 19:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iwustudentcenterpiazza.jpg

User has uploaded dozens of copyrighted images and claimed PD-self. This is a web resolution image of a busy student union building that happens to be empty with the chairs perfectly aligned. How likely a situation is that? Andrew c ^[talk] 19:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marinerschurchstudentcenter.jpg

Same as above, untrustworthy user uploaded webresolution image. Andrew c ^[talk] 19:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanley-Ann.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posed, clearly an old image. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Diosgyor007.jpg

Seems to have been taken from elsewhere. Watermark, low res, no information on how it was created. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaun-Donovan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posed (official?) photo. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:La-Jornada-collage.jpg

Collage of a newspaper - derivative work and not free Peripitus (Talk) 20:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]