Jump to content

Talk:David X. Li

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.51.72.144 (talk) at 15:02, 2 March 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm going to guess Mr. Li put this page up himself. Pioneered the use of Gaussian copulae? Oh really? I'm sure the statisticians who discovered these long ago would be surprised -- as would the statisticians at places like Renaissance and Citadel. This page should be deleted.--128.135.149.78 19:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't say that Mr Li pioneered the use of Gaussian Copulae, it says that he pioneered their use for the pricing of CDOs, which he did. The bigger problem with the article is that it basically just plagiarizes the wired article it cites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.42.22 (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph about his early life never quotes the wired article it cites explictly, but almost everything is plagarized either by taking the words directly or be using tiny variations. Isn't that against Wikipedia policy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.241.6.133 (talk) 19:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finished reading the Wired article and it looks like they copied most of it without citing the source. --68.51.72.144 (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]