Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 27

< February 26	February 28 >

February 27

File:Baku Satellite.jpg

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Baku87 taking satellite pictures. Baku87 uploads pictures to his website than gives permission to use it on wikipedia. That's clever. VartanM (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Empro1.jpg

Really not sure here. It's a picture of an ad/poster. What does that count as, if anything? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nobody's commented, the uploader is not active. It is a reproduction of a copyrighted 2D image, so I think that is just blatant copyvio. The uploader has released the image as GFDL, but it's still non-free, and unused. I think. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture myself, plus the ad/poster is quite old at this point (from year 2000?) and was related to the 'grand opening' of EMP, not an everyday image. Perhaps it's a violation, but it seems extremely unlikely here that anyone would object. If it's still against the rules, I don't mind it being removed. jkl_sem (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

File:S23rtdg3s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Msgj (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked, unlikely uploader is the creator. MER-C 09:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Christinetaylor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a copyrighted publicity photo. Uploader has several other copyright violations, but I'm listing here because I can't find a matching original source. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809266172/photo/premiere/970420791 PhilKnight (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grapesnump.jpg

Image is taken from artist's MySpace, nothing to indicate it is licensed as claimed (other URL shown on the image description page deadlinks) ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digsby release 19635.jpg

Contains various non-free logos. — neuro^(talk) 23:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Logos are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]