Talk:Andrew Pyle (philosopher)

Biography: Science and Academia Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Deletion Discussion

Does Andrew Pyle deserve a wikipedia page? Biographies of living people must be people of some significance, and this person does not seem to have any significance. There is no citation of anything on the page. Additionally, the neutrality of the article could be debated, especially the claim that he "is an authority on the history of philosophical atomism." Who decided that? And what makes the topic he researched "ill addressed"? 82.46.92.29 (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

gBooks shows subject to be a prolific author and editor, gScholar shows a significant presence (including 282 citations for one work, 181 for another). Clearly notable. Could the article use work? Yes. But it has only recently been tagged as such. 74.69.39.11 (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]