User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

This user is busy in real life until Tax Day and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page.

If you are a registered user, I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.

If you are an unregistered user, I will reply on this page and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your IP address' User talk page.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Image

I'd like to talk about the image deleted at Animal cruelty in rodeo. Specifically, what is the problem and how can it be corrected to make the image valid for use? I don't work with images often and need help. Thanks! Buttermilk1950 (talk) 03:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to use a rationale for including the image in the article? Buttermilk1950 (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I understand. Buttermilk1950 (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get a sense of humor, get a better perspective on life

Firstly, I would like to thank you for being so incredibly polite in your request that I stop making "unconstructive edits". Secondly -- you should have read that Imagination article, if you haven't already. That thing was so disgustingly dull, it murdered the brain. It may be a little over your head, but that one sentence I wrote tells you more about Imagination than that whole stupid article did before I changed it. Thirdly -- this I speak out of legitimate concern. It is for your own good. If you concern yourself with rules and conformity and society and everything, you shall grow old and fade into nothing, and have lived a life of monotony. The great irony is that most of the rules you follow were invented by people who broke the rules. Martin Luther King Jr. broke rules, the Founding Fathers broke tons of rules, and the list goes on. The fact is, the societies of man are as imperfect as the strengths and weaknesses of the individual. But even the individual has the right to act on their own sense of right and wrong, and not be based off of rules already set in place. I shall refer you to the so-called Transcendentalist philosophers of the 19th century -- they were mostly right, they just weren't all that convincing, and haven't been at all popular since the stinkin' Modernist movement in literature. -- Your Concerned Friend, Skunksforever —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skunksforever (talk • contribs) 16:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None whatsoever. :)

It was a single sentence, but I'm sure it won't be after you're through with it. :)) Have fun, bro! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

picture

The picture was on her website in the free pictures section,where people could only use certain images of her,and this picture was one of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IDKbaker (talk • contribs) 12:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Caban Cruz

This guy is a fraud and should be prosecuted under the stolen valor act. He was NOT a POW and considering the many very basic things that are wrong with his uniform it is doubtful if he was even in the military. I hope you do save the page though. The FBI will want it as evidence. Either way, many people have saved it in it's original form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.170.191 (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred, please view my response. cognitonium (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CREES

CREES page is necessary to explain briefly what CREES is and where it works. I did not put this information on the Manu Learning Centre page I created for fear of it being deleted for appearing too commercial.

Suggestions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CREES-MANU (talk • contribs) 11:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

DougsTech (talk) has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Young Love...

...thanks very much for your help. :o) ntnon (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crammage

The author of the Crammage page seems to be laboring under the impression that you are secretly associated with Anki, and has responded in retaliation by applying the same tag you applied to the Anki page. I noticed you also applied the tag to the Mnemosyne page, so I've added some more reviews to back up the article's notability. I posted on their talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:76.14.82.5

But the edit war still continues. Another person asserts "new higher standards" on the Anki history page, but I suspect this is simply a case of "if my product can't be on wikipedia, nobody's can!". I'd appreciate it if you could look into it and let us know which of us is in the wrong, or how this can be resolved.

58.3.182.104 (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've summed my views up pretty well at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crammage. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that's resulted in them retaliating against the Anki page again: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anki&action=history 58.3.182.104 (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(I suspect that 'Homeboyfrisco' and the other poster on the Crammage page are in fact sockpuppets) 58.3.182.104 (talk) 05:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]