Talk:Chris Brand

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Most of the citations in this page go to unremarkable personal websites, some of them racist in nature. Once again, Wikipedia proves its worthlessness as a reliable source of scholarly information. Randy Blackamoor 06:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The photo (him holding a newspaper calling for his firing) seems to be intended to elicit sympathy for his side in the controversy, which doesn't seem right for an encyclopedia article. Anybody think it should stay?--Nectar ^T 01:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that adding photos of subjects makes their articles POV? Can you explain how this photo "seems to be intended to elicit sympathy"? Thanks, -Willmcw 08:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see also that you are the editor who uploaded the image. ? -Willmcw 08:28, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia proves its worthlessness as a reliable source of scholarly information." Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that can be edited by anybody. It should never be seen as a reliable source. 19:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)