User talk:69.158.150.169
March 2009
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. ScarianCall me Pat! 08:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions[1] made on April 7 2009 to Template:Countries of Central America
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Also for incivility
William M. Connolley (talk) 19:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
69.158.150.169 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I started composing this on the 3rr page, but was (precipitously) blocked. Anyhow, I was previously engaged in reasoned discussion on a related template's talk page about the partial inclusion of Mexico in the region (as cited in the parent article), before the reporter withdrew from discussions (unable to convince the other commentator), another editor (Jcmenal) didn't even get involved, and they have both been reverting content ever since, resulting in a block on that template. They have been referring to my good-faith edits as 'vandalism', and it was Jcmenal who referred to me as a 'racist', apparently in response to me calling him 'illiterate' (highlighting the fact that both seem to have trouble editing and comprehending English). So, who's being incivil? These two editors have apparently been engaged in persistent edit warring for many months now about these sorts of topics, and both have been blocked ... especially the reporter. I'm unsure who 'Corticopia' is but he/she appears to have been inactive for awhile.
- Your caution has been read; I request to be unblocked, but I won't sweat if I'm not. Anyhow, a glance at the related talk pages will reveal edit warring on the part of the reporter and ally, so both should also be blocked. These are intransigent editors, edt warring for many months, who have been unwilling to compromise on the point. Given the lengthy issues with these editors, a longer/permanent block should be considered.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I started composing this on the 3rr page, but was (precipitously) blocked. Anyhow, I was previously engaged in reasoned discussion on a [[Template_talk:Central_America_topic#Edit_war|related template's talk page about the partial inclusion of Mexico in the region (as cited in the parent article)]], before the reporter withdrew from discussions (unable to convince the other commentator), another editor (Jcmenal) didn't even get involved, and they have both been reverting content ever since, resulting in a block on that template. They have been referring to my good-faith edits as 'vandalism', and it was Jcmenal who referred to me as a 'racist', apparently in response to me calling him 'illiterate' (highlighting the fact that both seem to have trouble editing and comprehending English). So, who's being incivil? These two editors have apparently been engaged in persistent edit warring for many months now about these sorts of topics, and both have been blocked ... especially the reporter. I'm unsure who 'Corticopia' is but he/she appears to have been inactive for awhile. :Your caution has been read; I request to be unblocked, but I won't sweat if I'm not. Anyhow, a glance at the related talk pages will reveal edit warring on the part of the reporter and ally, so both should also be blocked. These are intransigent editors, edt warring for many months, who have been unwilling to compromise on the point. Given the lengthy issues with these editors, a longer/permanent block should be considered. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I started composing this on the 3rr page, but was (precipitously) blocked. Anyhow, I was previously engaged in reasoned discussion on a [[Template_talk:Central_America_topic#Edit_war|related template's talk page about the partial inclusion of Mexico in the region (as cited in the parent article)]], before the reporter withdrew from discussions (unable to convince the other commentator), another editor (Jcmenal) didn't even get involved, and they have both been reverting content ever since, resulting in a block on that template. They have been referring to my good-faith edits as 'vandalism', and it was Jcmenal who referred to me as a 'racist', apparently in response to me calling him 'illiterate' (highlighting the fact that both seem to have trouble editing and comprehending English). So, who's being incivil? These two editors have apparently been engaged in persistent edit warring for many months now about these sorts of topics, and both have been blocked ... especially the reporter. I'm unsure who 'Corticopia' is but he/she appears to have been inactive for awhile. :Your caution has been read; I request to be unblocked, but I won't sweat if I'm not. Anyhow, a glance at the related talk pages will reveal edit warring on the part of the reporter and ally, so both should also be blocked. These are intransigent editors, edt warring for many months, who have been unwilling to compromise on the point. Given the lengthy issues with these editors, a longer/permanent block should be considered. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I started composing this on the 3rr page, but was (precipitously) blocked. Anyhow, I was previously engaged in reasoned discussion on a [[Template_talk:Central_America_topic#Edit_war|related template's talk page about the partial inclusion of Mexico in the region (as cited in the parent article)]], before the reporter withdrew from discussions (unable to convince the other commentator), another editor (Jcmenal) didn't even get involved, and they have both been reverting content ever since, resulting in a block on that template. They have been referring to my good-faith edits as 'vandalism', and it was Jcmenal who referred to me as a 'racist', apparently in response to me calling him 'illiterate' (highlighting the fact that both seem to have trouble editing and comprehending English). So, who's being incivil? These two editors have apparently been engaged in persistent edit warring for many months now about these sorts of topics, and both have been blocked ... especially the reporter. I'm unsure who 'Corticopia' is but he/she appears to have been inactive for awhile. :Your caution has been read; I request to be unblocked, but I won't sweat if I'm not. Anyhow, a glance at the related talk pages will reveal edit warring on the part of the reporter and ally, so both should also be blocked. These are intransigent editors, edt warring for many months, who have been unwilling to compromise on the point. Given the lengthy issues with these editors, a longer/permanent block should be considered. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |