March, 2009

Rever this edit[1] now, or I will file an AN/I report. Wikidemon (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I wont ... you shouldnt remove another users comments from the talk page. But the ANI was a good idea. CENSEI (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disengage from Wikidemon

Please stop taunting and pushing buttons of User:Wikidemon. Your contributions (and his) were disruptive and both of you are facing disruption blocks if this continues. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not intentionally pushing his buttons and wont engage him in the short term, but I don’t see how the community can continue to stand idly by while he steamrolls any editor he doesn’t like. CENSEI (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing wrong with bringing this to ANI. What was wrong was that before you did that, and after you did that, you pushed his buttons (and visa versa - not ascribing blame as to who started what with that).

The report on ANI will be reviewed. Your input there so far beyond the bare report has just disrupted things further and was not helpful. Please don't make it worse that way - there's more damage done in the ANI discussion than his original deletion caused, and that makes admins want to block everyone involved for extended periods of time. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. CENSEI (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail enabled. Ejnogarb (talk) 01:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Voice for Peace

Front Page Magazine isn't a reliable source, period. If you revert my edit again, I'm going to take you to WP:ANI. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 01:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It most certainly is a Relaible Source so take me to ANI, you were the one edit warring with not one, but two editors. CENSEI (talk) 01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CENSEI, I come into this completely uninvolved. I'd be more than willing to take a thorough look at the issue if you wanted, but I can tell you at a first glance that Front Page is no RS. I've really got no solid opinion on the issue (though I'd have no problem relaying what I may think via email). Grsz¹¹ 03:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing the links to the archival WP:RS noticeboard I would agree, but to reasonably argue that Commentary is not a RS and to argue that Malik hasnt been edit warring is just not possible. Had he not followed me to Joshua Muravchik, I really could have given a flying funk if he was blocked or not, but he did that out of spite and didnt even take to time to look at what he was reverting and that pissed me off a little.

But I am going to bed, and will check in around 0630 CENSEI (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Promiscuity. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 20:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You risk falling afoul of 3rr at Islam and antisemitism.Bali ultimate (talk) 03:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your email address

I've blocked Allstarecho for 24 hours for repeatedly posting your email address. Would you like to file for an oversight? I was going to delete the edits, but WP:ANI has so many edits that it can't really be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yandman 08:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

(ANI Discussion that led to this block here)

So...

...how are things going with that rope [2] ... "little man"? [3] Last word. 0:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 18:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see that you can be such a prick all the way to the end. Drop me an email if you got the stones to step away from behind the monitor. CENSEI (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of which... If you had had the "stones" to help Axmann8 when he needed you, after he had defended you, I wouldn't have bothered coming here today. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 18:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike too many here, I have a life outside of Wikipedia that requires a significant ammount of my time. Axeman and I had a nice long chat offline. But like I said, drop me a line if you want to party. CENSEI (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==

Hi CENSEI. As I understand it you are still able to post here? There is some discussion of whether your indefinite block is appropriate. I wonder if you would consider apologizing and to promise not to misuse the e-mail in the future? A committment to make your best efforts in abiding the letter and spirit of guidelines might also be good. Just a thought. I'm sure you may be upset and I see your are being taunted above, which is troubling giving the circumstances. It's certainly up to you and I'm only making a suggestion for your consideration. As far as I know you have yet to comment since the block. Good luck and take care whatever you decide. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just got back from a quick trip to Mexico City and havent really had time to digest all of this BS. I am going to request an unblock for no other reason than to have Allstarecho blocked for spamming my email with GLBT spam mail that also included my real name. Shitty thing is that I wasn’t even given an opportunity to defend myself on ANI, but that’s the way a good lynch mob is supposed to work, right? But all in good time. Can you link to the discussion of my indefinite block? CENSEI (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]